Michael Navitsky

2.4k citations
32 papers · 1.3k · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Navitsky

30 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Michael Navitsky
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 685
  • Physiology 844
  • Neurology 170
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 344
  • Neurology 205
Replace William R. Paljug with:
William R. Paljug United States
S. Gong Australia
Irina Savitcheva Sweden
Maria Shiung United States
Clare L. Smith Australia
H. Wiste United States
Taylor J. Mellinger United States
Tobias Skillbäck Sweden
Jonathan Graff‐Radford United States
Tiffany Cowie Australia
Michael Navitsky relative to William R. Paljug United States William R. Paljug's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.6×
William R. Paljug · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Navitsky

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Navitsky's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Navitsky with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Navitsky more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Navitsky

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Navitsky. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Navitsky. The network helps show where Michael Navitsky may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Navitsky, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Navitsky Line = papers co-authored together Michael Navitsky links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016312
2 2017263
3 2019162
4 2018126
5 2019124
6 201680
7 201758
8 201752
9 201427
10 202122
11 201415
12 202311
13 201211
14 201110
15 20219
16 20148
17 20257
18 20165
19 20152
20 20192

About Michael Navitsky

Michael Navitsky is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Psychiatry and Mental health, Physiology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Surgery, having authored 32 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (14 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (13 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (12 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (5 papers), Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases (5 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (4 papers), Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (4 papers) and Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (685 citations), Physiology (844 citations), Neurology (170 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (344 citations) and Neurology (205 citations). Michael Navitsky has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Michael D. Devous, Abhinay D. Joshi, Mark A. Mintun, Michael J. Pontecorvo, Sergey Shcherbinin, Adam J. Schwarz, James S. Dickson, Peng Yu, Ian Kennedy and Bradley B. Miller. Their work appears in journals such as Alzheimer s & Dementia, Journal of Nuclear Medicine, Brain, Artificial Organs and Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact