Nathan Stemmer

472 citations
51 papers · 377 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Nathan Stemmer

47 papers receiving 284 citations

Peers

Nathan Stemmer
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
  • General Psychology 25
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 226
  • History and Philosophy of Science 79
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 66
  • Cultural Studies 36
Replace C. A. Mace with:
C. A. Mace United Kingdom
Stuart Katz United States
George Botterill United Kingdom
Ausonio Marras Canada
Noam Chomsky United States
Keith Gunderson United States
Stephen P. Schwartz United States
Harrison A. Hall United States
Charles A. Fritz
Gregory McCulloch United Kingdom
Nathan Stemmer relative to C. A. Mace United Kingdom C. A. Mace's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×
C. A. Mace · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nathan Stemmer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan Stemmer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan Stemmer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan Stemmer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan Stemmer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan Stemmer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan Stemmer. The network helps show where Nathan Stemmer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Nathan Stemmer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nathan Stemmer Line = papers co-authored together Nathan Stemmer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199026
2 198124
3 197123
4
An empiricist theory of language acquisition
197322
5 199220
6
The roots of knowledge
198319
7 198718
8 198017
9 199616
10
The mind-body problem and Quine's repudiation theory
200115
11 198114
12 197314
13 198713
14 200412
15 197812
16 199211
17 19758
18 19717
19 19956
20 19756

About Nathan Stemmer

Nathan Stemmer is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, History and Philosophy of Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Philosophy and Language and Linguistics, having authored 51 papers that have together received 377 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (13 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (12 papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (11 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (8 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (5 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (4 papers), Language Development and Disorders (4 papers) and Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (25 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (226 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (79 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (66 citations) and Cultural Studies (36 citations). Nathan Stemmer has collaborated with scholars based in Israel and United States. Frequent co-authors include David C. Palmer, Jack Michael, Paul R. Brandon, Matthew P. Normand, I. M. Schlesinger and T. V. Joe Layng. Their work appears in journals such as Journal for General Philosophy of Science, Synthese, The Behavior Analyst, Philosophical Studies and Language Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact