Nathan Handley

1.5k citations
32 papers · 384 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Nathan Handley

30 papers receiving 379 citations

Peers

Nathan Handley
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Oncology 106
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 105
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 12
  • Pharmacology 32
  • Economics and Econometrics 32
Replace Pang-Hsiang Liu with:
Pang-Hsiang Liu United States
Vanessa da Costa Miranda Brazil
Gustavo Catalán Spain
Temsak Phungrassami Thailand
Kim Edmunds Australia
Amy M. Pick United States
Mona Sabharwal Canada
Edmund Njeru Njagi United Kingdom
Anna Hung United States
Florence Dedey Ghana
Nathan Handley relative to Pang-Hsiang Liu United States Pang-Hsiang Liu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.3×
Pang-Hsiang Liu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nathan Handley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan Handley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan Handley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan Handley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan Handley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan Handley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan Handley. The network helps show where Nathan Handley may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nathan Handley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nathan Handley Line = papers co-authored together Nathan Handley links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018100
2 202170
3 201937
4 202236
5 202128
6 202017
7 201513
8 202110
9 20179
10 20218
11 20227
12 20216
13 20236
14 20225
15 20165
16 20204
17 20213
18 20203
19 20203
20 20232

About Nathan Handley

Nathan Handley is a scholar working on Oncology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Economics and Econometrics, General Health Professions and Geriatrics and Gerontology, having authored 32 papers that have together received 384 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer survivorship and care (7 papers), Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer (6 papers), Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (5 papers), COVID-19 and healthcare impacts (3 papers), Frailty in Older Adults (3 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (3 papers), Healthcare cost, quality, practices (1 paper) and Primary Care and Health Outcomes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (106 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (105 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (12 citations), Pharmacology (32 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (32 citations). Nathan Handley has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Vietnam and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Justin E. Bekelman, Lynn M. Schuchter, Adam Binder, Kristin L. Rising, Arianna Heyer, Rachel E. Granberg, Alexzandra T. Gentsch, Brooke Worster, Emily Hajjar and Ana María López. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, JCO Oncology Practice, Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases, JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics and Otolaryngology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact