Countries where authors publish in JCO Oncology Practice
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in JCO Oncology Practice. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in JCO Oncology Practice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites JCO Oncology Practice more than expected).
Fields of papers published in JCO Oncology Practice
This network shows the impact of papers published in JCO Oncology Practice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in JCO Oncology Practice.
About JCO Oncology Practice
The 1.6k papers published in JCO Oncology Practice in the last decades have received a total of 11.5k indexed citations . Papers published in JCO Oncology Practice usually cover Oncology (382 papers), Family Practice (19 papers), Economics and Econometrics (231 papers), Health Informatics (11 papers) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (24 papers) specifically the topics of Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer (209 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (103 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (93 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (68 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (67 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (55 papers), Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations (42 papers) and Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers (38 papers). The most active scholars publishing in JCO Oncology Practice are Arjun Gupta, Aleix Prat, Olga Martínez‐Sáez, Timothy J. Brown, Caroline Schenkel, Moshe Chaim Ornstein, Abbey Fingeret, Jennifer Tran, Richard L. Schilsky and Reginald Tucker‐Seeley.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.