Countries where authors publish in JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics more than expected).
Fields of papers published in JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
This network shows the impact of papers published in JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics.
About JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
The 799 papers published in JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics in the last decades have received a total of 9.7k indexed citations . Papers published in JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics usually cover Health Informatics (22 papers), Family Practice (8 papers), Oncology (114 papers), Health Information Management (20 papers) and Cancer Research (35 papers) specifically the topics of Cancer survivorship and care (43 papers), Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (30 papers), AI in cancer detection (29 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (27 papers), Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education (22 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (21 papers), Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer (19 papers) and Electronic Health Records Systems (16 papers). The most active scholars publishing in JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics are Matvey B. Palchuk, Ümit Topaloĝlu, Debra A. Patt, Paul Macklin, John Metzcar, Randy Heiland, Yafei Wang, Anant Madabhushi, Andrew Janowczyk and Jack London.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.