Nathan Emery

844 citations
20 papers · 564 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Nathan Emery

20 papers receiving 557 citations

Peers

Nathan Emery
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Global and Planetary Change 227
  • Ecological Modeling 25
  • Plant Science 200
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 57
  • Atmospheric Science 73
Replace Amber C. Churchill with:
Amber C. Churchill United States
Kaisa Laitinen Finland
Ana Vasques Portugal
Yamina Pressler United States
Jiahui Zhang China
Morgan Ruelle United States
Alexandra M. Thorn United States
Anna Rita Frattaroli Italy
Fredrick W. Baker United States
Jack T. Tessier United States
Nathan Emery relative to Amber C. Churchill United States Amber C. Churchill's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Amber C. Churchill · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nathan Emery

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan Emery's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan Emery with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan Emery more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan Emery

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan Emery. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan Emery. The network helps show where Nathan Emery may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nathan Emery, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nathan Emery Line = papers co-authored together Nathan Emery links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 2018195
2 2019106
3 201942
4 201630
5 202028
6 202025
7 201922
8 202017
9 202116
10 202115
11 201915
12 201813
13 202112
14 20217
15 20137
16 20196
17 20154
18 20222
19 20251
20 20191

About Nathan Emery

Nathan Emery is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Plant Science, Atmospheric Science, Education and Ecology, having authored 20 papers that have together received 564 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (7 papers), Tree-ring climate responses (4 papers), Fire effects on ecosystems (4 papers), Remote Sensing in Agriculture (3 papers), Plant responses to elevated CO2 (3 papers), Evaluation of Teaching Practices (3 papers), Health and Medical Research Impacts (2 papers) and Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Global and Planetary Change (227 citations), Ecological Modeling (25 citations), Plant Science (200 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (57 citations) and Atmospheric Science (73 citations). Nathan Emery has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and China. Frequent co-authors include Z. Carter Berry, Gregory R. Goldsmith, Sybil G. Gotsch, Jason Olsen, Ali Soltani, Acer VanWallendael, Murilo de Melo Peixoto, David B. Lowry, Jessica Middlemis Maher and Diane Ebert‐May. Their work appears in journals such as Ecology and Evolution, Innovative Higher Education, Nature Ecology & Evolution, PLoS ONE and Fire.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact