Nathan A. Rohner

22 papers receiving 570 citations

Peers

Nathan A. Rohner
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Immunology 225
  • Biomaterials 115
  • Pharmaceutical Science 51
  • Oncology 197
  • Biomedical Engineering 162
Replace Caifeng Deng with:
Caifeng Deng China
Meghan J. O’Melia United States
L. Tiffany Lyle United States
Qiyu Tang China
Xuemeng Guo China
Allison N. Schorzman United States
Siyang Song China
Chayanon Ngambenjawong United States
Ela Markovsky Israel
Nathan A. Rohner relative to Caifeng Deng China Caifeng Deng's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Caifeng Deng · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nathan A. Rohner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan A. Rohner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan A. Rohner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan A. Rohner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan A. Rohner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan A. Rohner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan A. Rohner. The network helps show where Nathan A. Rohner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nathan A. Rohner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nathan A. Rohner Line = papers co-authored together Nathan A. Rohner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020121
2 201674
3 201671
4 201541
5 201540
6 201733
7 201832
8 202031
9 201919
10 202119
11 201518
12 202112
13 201411
14 202110
15 20199
16 20167
17 20206
18 20174
19 20214
20 20204

About Nathan A. Rohner

Nathan A. Rohner is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Oncology, Immunology and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 23 papers that have together received 573 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Immunotherapy and Immune Responses (5 papers), Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery (4 papers), Lymphatic System and Diseases (3 papers), Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery (3 papers), Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics (2 papers), Cell Adhesion Molecules Research (2 papers), Orthopedic Infections and Treatments (2 papers) and Antimicrobial agents and applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Immunology (225 citations), Biomaterials (115 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (51 citations), Oncology (197 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (162 citations). Nathan A. Rohner has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Spain and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Susan N. Thomas, Erin E. Edwards, Horst A. von Recum, Margaret P. Manspeaker, David M. Francis, Alex Schudel, Cody J. Higginson, Mei‐Kwan Yau, M. G. Finn and Meghan J. O’Melia. Their work appears in journals such as ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering, Macromolecular Bioscience, Pharmaceutics, Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Journal of Materials Chemistry B.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact