Macromolecular Bioscience

129.1k citations
3.9k papers · · active since 2001

Impact in

  • Biomaterials top 0.5%
    • biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
    • Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
    • Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
    • Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications

Papers in

    • Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery 558
    • biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties 344
    • Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications 231
    • Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications 780

Macromolecular Bioscience

3.8k papers receiving 126.2k citations

Peers

Macromolecular Bioscience
Comparison fields: 5 of 192
  • Biomaterials 47k
  • Molecular Medicine 19.2k
  • Pharmaceutical Science 8.1k
  • Surfaces, Coatings and Films 6.6k
  • Polymers and Plastics 9.6k
Replace Journal of Biomaterials Science Polymer Edition with:
Journal of Biomaterials Science Polymer Edition China
Journal of Materials Science Materials in Medicine China
Biomaterials Science China
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering China
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A United States
Advanced Science China
Reactive and Functional Polymers China
Advanced Healthcare Materials China
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B Applied Biomaterials United States
ACS Omega China
Macromolecular Bioscience relative to Journal of Biomaterials Science Polymer Edition China Journal of Biomaterials Science Polymer Edition's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.4×
Journal of Biomaterials Science Polymer Edition · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Macromolecular Bioscience

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Macromolecular Bioscience. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Macromolecular Bioscience with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Macromolecular Bioscience more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Macromolecular Bioscience

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Macromolecular Bioscience. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Macromolecular Bioscience.

About Macromolecular Bioscience

The 3.9k papers published in Macromolecular Bioscience in the last decades have received a total of 129.1k indexed citations . Papers published in Macromolecular Bioscience usually cover Biomaterials (1.5k papers), Molecular Medicine (782 papers), Surfaces, Coatings and Films (349 papers), Pharmaceutical Science (287 papers) and Rehabilitation (130 papers) specifically the topics of Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications (780 papers), Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery (558 papers), Polymer Surface Interaction Studies (345 papers), biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties (344 papers), Bone Tissue Engineering Materials (293 papers), Advanced Drug Delivery Systems (244 papers), RNA Interference and Gene Delivery (235 papers) and Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications (231 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Macromolecular Bioscience are Hideto Tsuji, Rafael A. Auras, Susan E. M. Selke, Bruce Harte, Rui Luís Reis, Lina Zhang, Vitaliy V. Khutoryanskiy, João Filipe Mano, Thomas J. Heinze and David J. Mooney.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact