Nataša Šimić

47 papers receiving 256 citations

Peers

Nataša Šimić
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Health 56
  • Clinical Psychology 96
  • Gender Studies 38
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 11
  • Social Psychology 42
Replace Daniela Fonseca de Freitas with:
Daniela Fonseca de Freitas United Kingdom
Jiayao Li China
William A. Edmonds United States
Paul R. Rasmussen United States
Lindsay C. Morton United States
Jenna Elgin United States
Kendra C. Smith United States
Michelle C. Quist United States
Ahmet Hamdi Alpaslan Türkiye
Emily Schryer Canada
Nataša Šimić relative to Daniela Fonseca de Freitas United Kingdom Daniela Fonseca de Freitas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Daniela Fonseca de Freitas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nataša Šimić

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nataša Šimić's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nataša Šimić with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nataša Šimić more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nataša Šimić

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nataša Šimić. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nataša Šimić. The network helps show where Nataša Šimić may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Nataša Šimić, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nataša Šimić Line = papers co-authored together Nataša Šimić links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201030
2 201823
3 202020
4 202118
5
Verbal and spatial functions during different phases of the menstrual cycle.
201216
6 201312
7 201212
8 201812
9 201711
10 201910
11 201710
12 20109
13 20177
14 20137
15 20226
16 20216
17 20176
18 20146
19 20225
20 20155

About Nataša Šimić

Nataša Šimić is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Education, Health and General Health Professions, having authored 57 papers that have together received 277 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intimate Partner and Family Violence (6 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (6 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (5 papers), Teacher Professional Development and Motivation (5 papers), Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (4 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (4 papers), Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (4 papers) and Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (56 citations), Clinical Psychology (96 citations), Gender Studies (38 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (11 citations) and Social Psychology (42 citations). Nataša Šimić has collaborated with scholars based in Croatia, Serbia and Bosnia and Herzegovina. Frequent co-authors include Kristina Sesar, Arta Dodaj, Ilija Manenica, Irena Pavela Banai, Danka Purić, Maja Rogić Vidaković, Benjamin Banai, Zoran Đogaš, Robert P. Burriss and Rosario Del Rey. Their work appears in journals such as Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders, Sexuality & Culture, Journal of Education for Teaching International Research and Pedagogy, Disability and Rehabilitation and Journal of Constructivist Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact