Michelle C. Quist

18 papers receiving 342 citations

Peers

Michelle C. Quist
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 139
  • Applied Psychology 26
  • Clinical Psychology 98
  • Social Psychology 80
  • Marketing 36
Replace Liana S. E. Hone with:
Liana S. E. Hone United States
Catherine Reynolds Australia
Agata Groyecka-Bernard Poland
Lubomir Lamy France
Timothy H. Wasserman United States
Boby Ho‐Hong Ching Macao
Alec T. Beall Canada
Patrick K. Durkee United States
Michaela Pfundmair Germany
Jennifer Ramsey United States
Michelle C. Quist relative to Liana S. E. Hone United States Liana S. E. Hone's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Liana S. E. Hone · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michelle C. Quist

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michelle C. Quist's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michelle C. Quist with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michelle C. Quist more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michelle C. Quist

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michelle C. Quist. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michelle C. Quist. The network helps show where Michelle C. Quist may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Michelle C. Quist, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michelle C. Quist Line = papers co-authored together Michelle C. Quist links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 201135
2 201131
3 201431
4 201129
5 201928
6 201526
7 201623
8 201421
9 201419
10 201118
11 202017
12 201616
13 201115
14 201311
15 201511
16 20159
17 20168
18
Opposite-sex siblings decrease attraction, but not prosocial attributions, to self-resembling opposite-sex faces
20124

About Michelle C. Quist

Michelle C. Quist is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Marketing, having authored 18 papers that have together received 352 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (7 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (4 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (4 papers), Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (4 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (3 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (3 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers) and Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (139 citations), Applied Psychology (26 citations), Clinical Psychology (98 citations), Social Psychology (80 citations) and Marketing (36 citations). Michelle C. Quist has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Jennifer L. Bryan, Chelsie M. Young, Dawn W. Foster, Lisa M. DeBruine, Benedict C. Jones, Finlay G. Smith, Christopher D. Watkins, Mai‐Ly N. Steers, Anthony C. Little and Clayton Neighbors. Their work appears in journals such as Personality and Individual Differences, Addictive Behaviors, The Journal of Social Psychology, International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction and Psychology of Religion and Spirituality.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact