Michelle C. Quist

19 papers receiving 363 citations

Peers

Michelle C. Quist
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 152
  • Applied Psychology 28
  • Clinical Psychology 103
  • Marketing 39
  • Social Psychology 82
Replace Liana S. E. Hone with:
Liana S. E. Hone United States
Bettina Zengel United States
Jeffrey K. Snyder United States
Lubomir Lamy France
Timothy H. Wasserman United States
Agata Groyecka-Bernard Poland
André Luiz Souza United States
Boby Ho‐Hong Ching Macao
Alec T. Beall Canada
Benjamin Winegard United States
Michelle C. Quist relative to Liana S. E. Hone United States Liana S. E. Hone's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×
Liana S. E. Hone · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michelle C. Quist

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michelle C. Quist's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michelle C. Quist with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michelle C. Quist more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michelle C. Quist

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michelle C. Quist. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michelle C. Quist. The network helps show where Michelle C. Quist may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Michelle C. Quist, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michelle C. Quist Line = papers co-authored together Michelle C. Quist links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 201138
2 201138
3 201432
4 201932
5 201129
6 201526
7 201623
8 201421
9 201420
10 201619
11 201118
12 201118
13 202017
14 201312
15 201511
16 20159
17 20168
18
Opposite-sex siblings decrease attraction, but not prosocial attributions, to self-resembling opposite-sex faces
20124
19 20231

About Michelle C. Quist

Michelle C. Quist is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology and Marketing, having authored 19 papers that have together received 376 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (7 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (4 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (4 papers), Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (4 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (3 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (3 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers) and Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (152 citations), Applied Psychology (28 citations), Clinical Psychology (103 citations), Marketing (39 citations) and Social Psychology (82 citations). Michelle C. Quist has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Jennifer L. Bryan, Chelsie M. Young, Dawn W. Foster, Lisa M. DeBruine, Benedict C. Jones, Finlay G. Smith, Christopher D. Watkins, Mai‐Ly N. Steers, Anthony C. Little and Clayton Neighbors. Their work appears in journals such as Addictive Behaviors, Personality and Individual Differences, International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, The Journal of Social Psychology and Psychology of Religion and Spirituality.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact