Natalie Hellman

2.0k citations
38 papers · 394 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Natalie Hellman

35 papers receiving 388 citations

Peers

Natalie Hellman
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 63
  • Pharmacology 178
  • Clinical Psychology 119
  • Biological Psychiatry 12
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 90
Replace Sriram Ramaswamy with:
Sriram Ramaswamy United States
Madelyne A. Bisby Australia
A. Asghari̇ Australia
Jeffrey Berlant United States
S Shapiro United States
Luca Rovai Italy
Victor J. Avila‐Quintero United States
Demetrios A. Julius United States
C. O'Brien United States
B. Lepri United States
Natalie Hellman relative to Sriram Ramaswamy United States Sriram Ramaswamy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Sriram Ramaswamy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Natalie Hellman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie Hellman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie Hellman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie Hellman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie Hellman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie Hellman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie Hellman. The network helps show where Natalie Hellman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Natalie Hellman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Natalie Hellman Line = papers co-authored together Natalie Hellman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016104
2 201927
3 201522
4 201520
5 202016
6 201914
7 202112
8 202011
9 201911
10 202011
11 202010
12 201810
13 202110
14 201910
15 20149
16 20209
17 20199
18 20198
19 20218
20 20198

About Natalie Hellman

Natalie Hellman is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Physiology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Clinical Psychology and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 38 papers that have together received 394 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (19 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (19 papers), Pain Management and Placebo Effect (11 papers), Pediatric Pain Management Techniques (7 papers), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (6 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (6 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (3 papers) and Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (63 citations), Pharmacology (178 citations), Clinical Psychology (119 citations), Biological Psychiatry (12 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (90 citations). Natalie Hellman has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Spain and Peru. Frequent co-authors include Matthew C. Morris, Uma Rao, James L. Abelson, Jamie L. Rhudy, Joanna O. Shadlow, B. Kuhn, Shreela Palit, M. Payne, Y. Güereca and Stephen Bruehl. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Pain, Pain, Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities, Annals of Behavioral Medicine and Biological Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact