Natalie Hamrick

12 papers receiving 567 citations

Peers

Natalie Hamrick
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 200
  • Biological Psychiatry 40
  • Applied Psychology 60
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 113
  • Social Psychology 133
Replace Sandra Sgoutas-Emch with:
Sandra Sgoutas-Emch United States
Katie Dahlke United States
Mollie T. McQuillan United States
Teresa I. Sivilli United States
Michael W. Hurst United States
Kyung Bong Koh South Korea
Douglas A. Raynor United States
Lennart Forsman Sweden
Julia Hyde United Kingdom
Autumn M. Gallegos United States
Natalie Hamrick relative to Sandra Sgoutas-Emch United States Sandra Sgoutas-Emch's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Sandra Sgoutas-Emch · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Natalie Hamrick

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie Hamrick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie Hamrick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie Hamrick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie Hamrick

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie Hamrick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie Hamrick. The network helps show where Natalie Hamrick may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Natalie Hamrick, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Natalie Hamrick Line = papers co-authored together Natalie Hamrick links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 2000150
2 2004119
3 2003107
4 200278
5 200261
6 200350
7 200618
8 19955
9 20204
10 20191
11 20181
12 20191
13 20020

About Natalie Hamrick

Natalie Hamrick is a scholar working on Behavioral Neuroscience, Accounting, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Clinical Psychology and Information Systems and Management, having authored 13 papers that have together received 595 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Business Law and Ethics (4 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (4 papers), Ethics in Business and Education (3 papers), Employer Branding and e-HRM (3 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (2 papers), Health, psychology, and well-being (2 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (2 papers) and Cardiovascular and exercise physiology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (200 citations), Biological Psychiatry (40 citations), Applied Psychology (60 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (113 citations) and Social Psychology (133 citations). Natalie Hamrick has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Sheldon Cohen, Pamela J. Feldman, Mario Rodriguez, Bruce S. Rabin, Stephen B. Manuck, Stephen J. Lepore, Michael A. Diefenbach, Alan Pollack, Eric M. Horwitz and Richard E. Greenberg. Their work appears in journals such as Health Psychology, Annals of Behavioral Medicine, The Journal of Urology, Brain Behavior and Immunity and Psychosomatic Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact