Julia Hyde

666 citations
8 papers · 509 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Julia Hyde

7 papers receiving 457 citations

Peers

Julia Hyde
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 102
  • Applied Psychology 87
  • Biological Psychiatry 16
  • Social Psychology 108
  • Clinical Psychology 86
Replace Douglas A. Raynor with:
Douglas A. Raynor United States
Adam Finch Australia
Natalie Hamrick United States
Robert L. Gabrys Canada
Allen Brenzel United States
Sandra Sgoutas-Emch United States
Lennart Forsman Sweden
Jennifer Pearce United Kingdom
Neil B. Rappaport United States
Erica R. Scioli United States
Julia Hyde relative to Douglas A. Raynor United States Douglas A. Raynor's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Douglas A. Raynor · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Julia Hyde

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Hyde's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Hyde with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Hyde more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Hyde

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Hyde. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Hyde. The network helps show where Julia Hyde may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Julia Hyde, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Julia Hyde Line = papers co-authored together Julia Hyde links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1 2000244
2 2008137
3
A qualitative study exploring how GPs decide to prescribe antidepressants.
200573
4
Deciding who gets treatment for depression and anxiety: a study of consecutive GP attenders.
200529
5 200724
6
Models for providing improved care in residential care homes: A thematic literature review.: Master Bibliography
20081
7
A review of evidence on non-invasive prenatal diagnosis (NIPD) : tests for fetal RHD genotype
20071
8 20250

About Julia Hyde

Julia Hyde is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Infectious Diseases, Pharmacology, Social Psychology and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 8 papers that have together received 509 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Behavioral Health and Interventions (1 paper), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (1 paper), Mental Health Research Topics (1 paper), Blood groups and transfusion (1 paper), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (1 paper), Parvovirus B19 Infection Studies (1 paper), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (1 paper) and Community Health and Development (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (102 citations), Applied Psychology (87 citations), Biological Psychiatry (16 citations), Social Psychology (108 citations) and Clinical Psychology (86 citations). Julia Hyde has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Kavita Vedhara, Sue Plummer, Iain D. Gilchrist, Michelle Tytherleigh, Theresa M. Marteau, Alicia Deale, Matthew Hankins, Glyn Lewis, David Keßler and Michael Calnan. Their work appears in journals such as Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, Psychoneuroendocrinology, Journal of Health Psychology, Journal of Adolescent Health and PubMed.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact