Natalie E. King
Impact in
- Neurology top 5%
- Barrier Structure and Function Studies
- Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
- Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
- Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
-
- Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Papers in
-
- Barrier Structure and Function Studies 5
- Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments 2
- Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms 2
- Urology 1
- Co-authors
- Jo‐Maree Courtney (5 shared papers)Brad A. Sutherland (5 shared papers)David William Howells (4 shared papers)Lachlan S. Brown (4 shared papers)Catherine G. Foster (2 shared papers)James Clement Vickers (1 shared paper)Jenna M. Ziebell (1 shared paper)Robert Gasperini (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Cell Biology and Toxicology (1 paper)Neuroscience (1 paper)Stem Cell Research & Therapy (1 paper)Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology (1 paper)The American Surgeon (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaNew Zealand
In The Last Decade
Natalie E. King
7 papers receiving 372 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
- Neurology 184
- Developmental Neuroscience 19
- Biological Psychiatry 7
- Neurology 43
- Genetics 19
Countries citing papers authored by Natalie E. King
This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie E. King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie E. King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie E. King more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie E. King
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie E. King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie E. King. The network helps show where Natalie E. King may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Natalie E. King, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2019 | 317 | |
| 2 | 2023 | 20 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 20 | |
| 4 | 2022 | 8 | |
| 5 | 2022 | 8 | |
| 6 | 2024 | 4 | |
| 7 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 8 | 2025 | 0 |
About Natalie E. King
Natalie E. King is a scholar working on Neurology, Urology, Cell Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Physiology, having authored 8 papers that have together received 379 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Barrier Structure and Function Studies (5 papers), Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (2 papers), Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (2 papers), Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques (1 paper), Axon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling (1 paper), Cancer Cells and Metastasis (1 paper), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (1 paper) and Kruppel-like factors research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (184 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (19 citations), Biological Psychiatry (7 citations), Neurology (43 citations) and Genetics (19 citations). Natalie E. King has collaborated with scholars based in Australia and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Jo‐Maree Courtney, Brad A. Sutherland, David William Howells, Lachlan S. Brown, Catherine G. Foster, James Clement Vickers, Jenna M. Ziebell, Robert Gasperini, Lisa C Foa and Kimberley E. Stuart. Their work appears in journals such as Cell Biology and Toxicology, Neuroscience, Stem Cell Research & Therapy, Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology and The American Surgeon.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.