Natalie Anton

981 citations
29 papers · 603 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Natalie Anton

29 papers receiving 576 citations

Peers

Natalie Anton
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Internal Medicine 64
  • Emergency Medicine 102
  • Emergency Medical Services 67
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 227
  • Clinical Psychology 111
Replace Alexander Friedman with:
Alexander Friedman United States
T. Pottecher France
Wil B. Geven Netherlands
Mark Soth Canada
Bryan McNair United States
James A. Vosswinkel United States
Sumesh Thomas Canada
T. Buckley Hong Kong
Jakob Hjort Denmark
Bradley Wibrow Australia
Natalie Anton relative to Alexander Friedman United States Alexander Friedman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.8×
Alexander Friedman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Natalie Anton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie Anton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie Anton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie Anton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie Anton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie Anton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie Anton. The network helps show where Natalie Anton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Natalie Anton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Natalie Anton Line = papers co-authored together Natalie Anton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200882
2 201157
3 200956
4 201645
5 200939
6 201238
7 200136
8 201135
9 200630
10 201028
11 201624
12 200718
13 200818
14 200813
15 200912
16 202112
17 20059
18 20028
19 20038
20 20198

About Natalie Anton

Natalie Anton is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Surgery, Emergency Medicine, Small Animals and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 29 papers that have together received 603 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Organ Donation and Transplantation (10 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (5 papers), Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes (5 papers), Animal testing and alternatives (4 papers), Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus (4 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (4 papers), Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis (3 papers) and Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Internal Medicine (64 citations), Emergency Medicine (102 citations), Emergency Medical Services (67 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (227 citations) and Clinical Psychology (111 citations). Natalie Anton has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Thailand. Frequent co-authors include Ari R. Joffe, Allan DeCaen, M. Patricia Massicotte, Laurance Lequier, Jonathan P. Duff, Lisa Tjosvold, Bodil Katrine Larsen, Lisa Hartling, Ben Vandermeer and Ivan M. Rebeyka. Their work appears in journals such as PEDIATRICS, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, BMC Medical Ethics, Intensive Care Medicine and Philosophy Ethics and Humanities in Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact