Nathan Nobis

694 citations
38 papers · 305 · h-index 8

Impact in

    • Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
    • Animal testing and alternatives
  • Philosophy top 5%
    • Philosophical Ethics and Theory

Papers in

    • Animal testing and alternatives 11
    • Theology and Philosophy of Evil 4
    • Philosophical Ethics and Theory 2

Nathan Nobis

34 papers receiving 271 citations

Peers

Nathan Nobis
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Small Animals 68
  • Philosophy 55
  • Geography, Planning and Development 23
  • Social Psychology 77
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 67
Replace Andrew Linzey with:
Andrew Linzey United Kingdom
Elisa Aaltola Finland
Óscar Horta Spain
Jeff Sebo United States
Paola Cavalieri Italy
Carrie Packwood Freeman United States
Richard D. Ryder United Kingdom
Stephen Cooke United Kingdom
Evelyn B. Pluhar United States
Morten Tønnessen Norway
Nathan Nobis relative to Andrew Linzey United Kingdom Andrew Linzey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Andrew Linzey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nathan Nobis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan Nobis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan Nobis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan Nobis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan Nobis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan Nobis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan Nobis. The network helps show where Nathan Nobis may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Nathan Nobis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nathan Nobis Line = papers co-authored together Nathan Nobis links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201081
2 201958
3 201625
4 200424
5 201819
6 201817
7 200214
8 201611
9
Putting Humans First
20045
10
Ayer and Stevenson’s Epistemological Emotivisms
20044
11 20194
12 20193
13 20153
14
The “Babe” Vegetarians: Bioethics, Animal Minds and Moral Methodology
20093
15 20083
16
So Why Does Animal Experimentation Matter
20032
17
Animals and Rights
20072
18 20162
19 20052
20 20072

About Nathan Nobis

Nathan Nobis is a scholar working on Small Animals, Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 38 papers that have together received 305 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal testing and alternatives (11 papers), Environmental Philosophy and Ethics (4 papers), Theology and Philosophy of Evil (4 papers), Religion, Ecology, and Ethics (3 papers), Ethics in medical practice (3 papers), Diverse Philosophical and Cultural Studies (2 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (2 papers) and Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Small Animals (68 citations), Philosophy (55 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (23 citations), Social Psychology (77 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (67 citations). Nathan Nobis has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Lori Marino, Randy Malamud, Scott O. Lilienfeld, Natalie Anton, Ari R. Joffe, David Graham, Letitia Meynell, Gary Comstock, Will Kymlicka and L. Syd M Johnson. Their work appears in journals such as The American Journal of Bioethics, BMC Medical Ethics, Philosophy Ethics and Humanities in Medicine, Croatian Journal of Philosophy and Journal of Applied Philosophy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact