Natalie Abrams
Impact in
- Pharmacology top 10%
- Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis
- Fungal Biology and Applications
Papers in
-
- Ethics in medical practice 6
- Oncology 6
- Cancer Cells and Metastasis 3
- Co-authors
- William C. Nierman (3 shared papers)Jaeyoung Choi (1 shared paper)Bong Soo Park (1 shared paper)Jongsun Park (1 shared paper)Seogchan Kang (1 shared paper)Yong‐Hwan Lee (1 shared paper)Liliana Losada (2 shared papers)Ralph A. Dean (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- The Journal of Immunology (2 papers)Pancreas (2 papers)Oncotarget (1 paper)Nature Immunology (1 paper)The FASEB Journal (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesMalaysiaJapan
In The Last Decade
Natalie Abrams
22 papers receiving 713 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 121
- Health Informatics 10
- Pharmacology 90
- Cell Biology 83
- Plant Science 194
- Issues, ethics and legal aspects 5
Countries citing papers authored by Natalie Abrams
This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie Abrams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie Abrams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie Abrams more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie Abrams
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie Abrams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie Abrams. The network helps show where Natalie Abrams may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Natalie Abrams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2012 | 136 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 109 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 103 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 65 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 57 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 44 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 38 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 27 | |
| 9 | 2015 | 26 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 24 | |
| 11 | 2024 | 20 | |
| 12 | 1978 | 19 | |
| 13 | 2020 | 16 | |
| 14 | 2019 | 14 | |
| 15 | 2021 | 12 | |
| 16 | 1984 | 9 | |
| 17 | 1978 | 4 | |
| 18 | 1979 | 2 | |
| 19 | 1982 | 2 | |
| 20 | A contrary view of the nurse as patient advocate. | 1990 | 2 |
About Natalie Abrams
Natalie Abrams is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Oncology, Molecular Biology, Plant Science and Cancer Research, having authored 23 papers that have together received 732 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in medical practice (6 papers), Cancer Cells and Metastasis (3 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (2 papers), Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics (2 papers), Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging (2 papers), Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity (2 papers), Patient Dignity and Privacy (2 papers) and Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (10 citations), Pharmacology (90 citations), Cell Biology (83 citations), Plant Science (194 citations) and Issues, ethics and legal aspects (5 citations). Natalie Abrams has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Malaysia and Japan. Frequent co-authors include William C. Nierman, Jaeyoung Choi, Bong Soo Park, Jongsun Park, Seogchan Kang, Yong‐Hwan Lee, Liliana Losada, Ralph A. Dean, Christina Liu and Pushpa Tandon. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Immunology, Pancreas, Oncotarget, Nature Immunology and The FASEB Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.