William Hoos

965 citations
18 papers · 511 · h-index 8

Impact in

  • Oncology top 10%
    • Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
    • Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
    • HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research

Papers in

    • Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research 11
    • HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research 2
    • Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics 8

William Hoos

17 papers receiving 503 citations

Peers

William Hoos
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Oncology 388
  • Health Informatics 19
  • Cancer Research 173
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 71
  • Surgery 129
Replace Alexander Ney with:
Alexander Ney United Kingdom
Yasushi Iida Japan
Ninah Achacoso United States
Anna Pellat France
Brett Mahon United States
Mohamed A. Gouda United States
Jonathan Somma United States
Octavian Sabin Tătaru Romania
Federica Marmorino Italy
Yeqian Feng China
William Hoos relative to Alexander Ney United Kingdom Alexander Ney's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×27×
Alexander Ney · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Hoos

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Hoos's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Hoos with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Hoos more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Hoos

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Hoos. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Hoos. The network helps show where William Hoos may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Hoos, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Hoos Line = papers co-authored together William Hoos links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 2018224
2 201568
3 201649
4 201348
5 202136
6 201932
7 201824
8 202310
9 20194
10 20203
11 20163
12 20222
13 20162
14 20222
15 20172
16 20141
17 20151
18 20150

About William Hoos

William Hoos is a scholar working on Oncology, Cancer Research, Molecular Biology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 18 papers that have together received 511 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (11 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (8 papers), Advanced Biosensing Techniques and Applications (4 papers), Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (3 papers), Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Health and Medical Research Impacts (2 papers), HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research (2 papers) and Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (388 citations), Health Informatics (19 citations), Cancer Research (173 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (71 citations) and Surgery (129 citations). William Hoos has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Spain and Palestinian Territory. Frequent co-authors include Suresh T. Chari, Ayush Sharma, Sajan Jiv Singh Nagpal, Gloria M. Petersen, Ziding Feng, Harika Kandlakunta, Lola Rahib, Lynn M. Matrisian, Julie Fleshman and Vicente Peg. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Pancreas, Molecular Oncology, The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics and Targeted Oncology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact