Nancy Bell

2.8k citations
71 papers · 1.7k · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

Nancy Bell

66 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Nancy Bell
Comparison fields: 5 of 122
  • Language and Linguistics 604
  • Literature and Literary Theory 533
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 505
  • Social Psychology 671
  • Conservation 108
Replace Peter Medway with:
Peter Medway Canada
Aviva Freedman Canada
Teresa Cremin United Kingdom
Thomas Leddy United States
Lisa F. Smith New Zealand
Liora Bresler United States
Maurice Nevile Australia
Lixian Jin United Kingdom
Anatoliy V. Kharkhurin United Arab Emirates
David Galbraith United Kingdom
Nancy Bell relative to Peter Medway Canada Peter Medway's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×12.9×
Peter Medway · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nancy Bell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nancy Bell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nancy Bell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nancy Bell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nancy Bell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nancy Bell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nancy Bell. The network helps show where Nancy Bell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nancy Bell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nancy Bell Line = papers co-authored together Nancy Bell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 71 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1991145
2 2005109
3 2009106
4 200797
5 200895
6 201180
7 200778
8 201066
9 201553
10 201152
11 200746
12 201245
13 198545
14 201238
15 201536
16 200636
17 201133
18 200730
19 201528
20 200928

About Nancy Bell

Nancy Bell is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Language and Linguistics, Literature and Literary Theory and Conservation, having authored 71 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Humor Studies and Applications (22 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (20 papers), Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (16 papers), EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (15 papers), Conservation Techniques and Studies (13 papers), Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis (7 papers), Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation (6 papers) and Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Language and Linguistics (604 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (533 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (505 citations), Social Psychology (671 citations) and Conservation (108 citations). Nancy Bell has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Anne Pomerantz, Anne‐Nelly Perret‐Clermont, Salvatore Attardo, Matija Strlič, Stephen Skalicky, Eugene Matusov, Barbara Rogoff, Catherine Dillon, Kalliopi Fouseki and Cynthia M. Berger. Their work appears in journals such as Heritage Science, Journal of Pragmatics, Studies in Conservation, Humor - International Journal of Humor Research and Language Learning.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact