Journal of the American Institute for Conservation · 1×
×1.26k/4kCONSE
×1.38k/6kARCHE
×1.25k/4kEP
×2.1779/371SPS
×3.92k/441GEOLO
Citations per year
'16
'17
'18
'19
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24
'25
'26
Countries where authors publish in Heritage Science
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Heritage Science. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Heritage Science with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Heritage Science more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Heritage Science. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Heritage Science.
About Heritage Science
The 1.5k papers published in Heritage Science in the last decades have received a total of 16.1k indexed citations . Papers published in Heritage Science usually cover Conservation (600 papers), Archeology (902 papers), Earth-Surface Processes (580 papers), Space and Planetary Science (96 papers) and Archeology (32 papers) specifically the topics of Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis (769 papers), Conservation Techniques and Studies (596 papers), Building materials and conservation (576 papers), 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage (153 papers), Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (116 papers), Archaeological Research and Protection (96 papers), Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation (88 papers) and Land Use and Ecosystem Services (65 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Heritage Science are Bente Philippsen, Antonino Cosentino, Sayed Hemeda, Matija Strlič, Josep Grau‐Bové, Koen Janssens, John K. Delaney, Paola Ricciardi, Kathryn A. Dooley and Omid Oudbashı.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.