Namika Sagara

453 citations
7 papers · 304 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Namika Sagara

7 papers receiving 282 citations

Peers

Namika Sagara
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • General Decision Sciences 58
  • Applied Psychology 46
  • Safety Research 50
  • Accounting 52
  • Demography 45
Replace Jing Qian with:
Jing Qian China
Anna Maria Manganelli Rattazzi Italy
Fanmin Kong United States
Barbara Young United States
Thomas D. Gilovich United States
Matthijs Poppe Netherlands
Deirdre Gobeille Snyder United States
Angela Rachael Dorrough Germany
Ozan İşler Australia
Natalia Jiménez Spain
Namika Sagara relative to Jing Qian China Jing Qian's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Jing Qian · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Namika Sagara

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Namika Sagara's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Namika Sagara with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Namika Sagara more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Namika Sagara

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Namika Sagara. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Namika Sagara. The network helps show where Namika Sagara may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Namika Sagara, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Namika Sagara Line = papers co-authored together Namika Sagara links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown
#Work
1 2010184
2 201255
3 200935
4 201213
5 201212
6
Individual Heterogeneity in Loss Aversion and Its Impact on Social Security Claiming Decisions
20154
7
Development of an Individual Measure of Loss Aversion
20151

About Namika Sagara

Namika Sagara is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Social Psychology, Accounting, Demography and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 7 papers that have together received 304 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (5 papers), Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis (3 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (2 papers), Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management (2 papers), Agricultural risk and resilience (1 paper), Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion (1 paper), Behavioral Health and Interventions (1 paper) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (58 citations), Applied Psychology (46 citations), Safety Research (50 citations), Accounting (52 citations) and Demography (45 citations). Namika Sagara has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Paul Slovic, Stephan Dickert, Christopher Y. Olivola, John W. Payne, Suzanne B. Shu, Eric J. Johnson, Kirstin C. Appelt, Ellen Peters, Dan Schley and Howard Kunreuther. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, Risk Analysis and SSRN Electronic Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact