Dan Schley

18 papers receiving 416 citations

Peers

Dan Schley
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • General Decision Sciences 185
  • Applied Psychology 55
  • Statistics and Probability 70
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 87
  • Marketing 41
Replace Ellen Evers with:
Ellen Evers United States
Sarah Furlan Italy
Ana M. Franco‐Watkins United States
Marc Jekel Germany
Sandra Andraszewicz Switzerland
Simon McNair United Kingdom
Tzur M. Karelitz United States
Sabine Hügelschäfer Germany
Thibault Gajdos France
David Faro United Kingdom
Dan Schley relative to Ellen Evers United States Ellen Evers's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Ellen Evers · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dan Schley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dan Schley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dan Schley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dan Schley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dan Schley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dan Schley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dan Schley. The network helps show where Dan Schley may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Dan Schley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dan Schley Line = papers co-authored together Dan Schley links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 201495
2 201776
3 201355
4 201742
5 201633
6 201526
7 201620
8 202018
9 201418
10 201417
11 201213
12 20139
13 20116
14
When 15% Off Plus 10% Off Is More Than 30% Off: Multiple-Discount Promotions Are Preferred to Larger Single-Discount Promotions
20135
15
Symbolic-Number Mapping in Judgments and Decisions: A Correlational and Experimental Approach
20152
16 20162
17 20211
18 20231
19 20250

About Dan Schley

Dan Schley is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Cognitive Neuroscience, Economics and Econometrics, Applied Psychology and Social Psychology, having authored 19 papers that have together received 439 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (10 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (5 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (4 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (3 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (3 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (2 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (2 papers) and Behavioral and Psychological Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (185 citations), Applied Psychology (55 citations), Statistics and Probability (70 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (87 citations) and Marketing (41 citations). Dan Schley has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Ellen Peters, Brandon M. Turner, Konstantinos Tsetsos, Michael L. DeKay, Kentaro Fujita, Manfred H. M. van Dulmen, Daniel J. Flannery, Amy B. Brunell, Mark S. Davis and Kelly L. Wester. Their work appears in journals such as Psychological Review, Risk Analysis, Psychological Science, Frontiers in Psychology and Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact