Naïma Nedjar
Impact in
- Microbiology top 5%
- Antimicrobial Peptides and Activities
- Insect Science top 5%
- Insect Utilization and Effects
Papers in
-
- Protein Hydrolysis and Bioactive Peptides 29
-
- Insect Utilization and Effects 15
- Co-authors
- Pascal Dhulster (16 shared papers)Loubna Firdaous (4 shared papers)Gabrielle Châtaigné (4 shared papers)Rémi Przybylski (6 shared papers)Rafik Balti (12 shared papers)Ali Bougatef (8 shared papers)Laurent Bazinet (6 shared papers)Christophe Flahaut (11 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
Naïma Nedjar
32 papers receiving 610 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
- Microbiology 94
- Insect Science 162
- Animal Science and Zoology 102
- Food Science 171
- Aquatic Science 65
Countries citing papers authored by Naïma Nedjar
This map shows the geographic impact of Naïma Nedjar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Naïma Nedjar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Naïma Nedjar more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Naïma Nedjar
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Naïma Nedjar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Naïma Nedjar. The network helps show where Naïma Nedjar may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Naïma Nedjar, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2016 | 115 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 60 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 40 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 38 | |
| 5 | 2016 | 37 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 33 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 30 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 28 | |
| 9 | 2015 | 27 | |
| 10 | 2018 | 23 | |
| 11 | 2018 | 19 | |
| 12 | 2017 | 18 | |
| 13 | 2020 | 18 | |
| 14 | 1990 | 17 | |
| 15 | 2024 | 17 | |
| 16 | 2021 | 14 | |
| 17 | 2021 | 13 | |
| 18 | 2024 | 11 | |
| 19 | 2022 | 10 | |
| 20 | 2015 | 8 |
About Naïma Nedjar
Naïma Nedjar is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Insect Science, Physiology, Aquatic Science and Animal Science and Zoology, having authored 34 papers that have together received 619 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Protein Hydrolysis and Bioactive Peptides (29 papers), Insect Utilization and Effects (15 papers), Biochemical effects in animals (7 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (6 papers), Antimicrobial Peptides and Activities (4 papers), Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth (4 papers), Proteins in Food Systems (4 papers) and Algal biology and biofuel production (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Microbiology (94 citations), Insect Science (162 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (102 citations), Food Science (171 citations) and Aquatic Science (65 citations). Naïma Nedjar has collaborated with scholars based in France, Tunisia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Pascal Dhulster, Loubna Firdaous, Gabrielle Châtaigné, Rémi Przybylski, Rafik Balti, Ali Bougatef, Laurent Bazinet, Christophe Flahaut, Barbara Deracinois and Jacinthe Thibodeau. Their work appears in journals such as Waste and Biomass Valorization, Membranes, International Journal of Molecular Sciences, Food Chemistry and Separation and Purification Technology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.