Nabil Amara

7.2k citations
88 papers · 5.4k · h-index 34

Impact in

Papers in

Nabil Amara

87 papers receiving 5.0k citations

Peers

Nabil Amara
Comparison fields: 5 of 144
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 1.3k
  • Strategy and Management 2.0k
  • Business and International Management 215
  • Public Administration 205
  • Management Science and Operations Research 622
Replace Réjean Landry with:
Réjean Landry Canada
Jason Owen‐Smith United States
Laurel Smith‐Doerr United States
Laura B. Cardinal United States
Markus Perkmann United Kingdom
Kenneth W. Koput United States
Philip Bromiley United States
John Dumay Australia
Zur Shapira United States
Bart Nooteboom Netherlands
Nabil Amara relative to Réjean Landry Canada Réjean Landry's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Réjean Landry · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nabil Amara

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nabil Amara's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nabil Amara with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nabil Amara more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nabil Amara

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nabil Amara. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nabil Amara. The network helps show where Nabil Amara may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nabil Amara, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nabil Amara Line = papers co-authored together Nabil Amara links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 88 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002475
2 2001388
3 2004362
4 2004327
5 2003305
6 2006230
7 2001206
8 2006202
9 2015199
10 2008191
11 2008183
12 2009158
13 2010141
14 1998134
15 2019131
16 1998114
17 2007107
18 2005105
19 2013101
20 201596

About Nabil Amara

Nabil Amara is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation, Sociology and Political Science and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 88 papers that have together received 5.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovation and Knowledge Management (37 papers), Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (18 papers), Firm Innovation and Growth (13 papers), Innovation Policy and R&D (12 papers), Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis (11 papers), scientometrics and bibliometrics research (9 papers), Higher Education Governance and Development (6 papers) and Management and Organizational Studies (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management of Technology and Innovation (1.3k citations), Strategy and Management (2.0k citations), Business and International Management (215 citations), Public Administration (205 citations) and Management Science and Operations Research (622 citations). Nabil Amara has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Spain and United States. Frequent co-authors include Réjean Landry, Моктар Ламари, Mathieu Ouimet, Norrin Halilem, Namatié Traoré, David Doloreux, Nizar Becheikh, Pablo D’Este, Julia Olmos‐Peñuela and Henry Quesada. Their work appears in journals such as Research Policy, Journal of Business Research, Scientometrics, Technovation and Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact