Na Chen

469 citations
37 papers · 278 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Na Chen

35 papers receiving 277 citations

Peers

Na Chen
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Sensory Systems 38
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 87
  • Social Psychology 87
  • Neurology 33
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 40
Replace Maria Gerasimenko with:
Maria Gerasimenko Japan
Roger Holmes Watkins France
Aleksandrov Aa Russia
Arthur Matthys France
Catherine I. Andreu Chile
Ilsong Choi South Korea
Kristin Koller United Kingdom
Diana Gómez Colombia
Prisca E. Zimmerman United States
Maeng-Keun Oh South Korea
Na Chen relative to Maria Gerasimenko Japan Maria Gerasimenko's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.2×
Maria Gerasimenko · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Na Chen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Na Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Na Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Na Chen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Na Chen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Na Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Na Chen. The network helps show where Na Chen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Na Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Na Chen Line = papers co-authored together Na Chen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201331
2 201923
3 201522
4 201218
5 201418
6 202117
7 202217
8 202116
9 201515
10 201512
11 20169
12 20158
13 20207
14 20157
15 20176
16 20166
17 20186
18 20185
19 20234
20 20233

About Na Chen

Na Chen is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sensory Systems, Cognitive Neuroscience and Molecular Biology, having authored 37 papers that have together received 278 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Color perception and design (18 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (17 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (9 papers), Categorization, perception, and language (7 papers), RNA regulation and disease (5 papers), Aesthetic Perception and Analysis (3 papers), Color Science and Applications (2 papers) and Hereditary Neurological Disorders (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (38 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (87 citations), Social Psychology (87 citations), Neurology (33 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (40 citations). Na Chen has collaborated with scholars based in Japan, China and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Katsumi Watanabe, Kanji Tanaka, Makoto Wada, Daisuke Matsuyoshi, Zaiqiang Zhang, Jinxi Lin, Jingmin Wang, Ye Wu, Jun Kimura and Tatsu Kobayakawa. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Psychology, Scientific Reports, PLoS ONE, Clinical Neurophysiology and Acta Psychologica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact