N. R. Schultz

40 papers receiving 840 citations

Peers

N. R. Schultz
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 44
  • Health 135
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 184
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 134
  • Applied Psychology 47
Replace Robert R. Golden with:
Robert R. Golden United States
Pertti Keskivaara Finland
Jeffrey D. Gfeller United States
Walter R. Cunningham United States
Robert G. Harper United States
Tze‐Chun Tang Taiwan
Norman Abeles United States
Nick Kanas United States
Emanuela Rabaglietti Italy
Enrique García Fernández-Abascal Spain
N. R. Schultz relative to Robert R. Golden United States Robert R. Golden's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.8×
Robert R. Golden · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by N. R. Schultz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of N. R. Schultz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by N. R. Schultz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites N. R. Schultz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by N. R. Schultz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by N. R. Schultz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by N. R. Schultz. The network helps show where N. R. Schultz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside N. R. Schultz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with N. R. Schultz Line = papers co-authored together N. R. Schultz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1983163
2 199074
3 198767
4 198465
5 198854
6 198654
7 197949
8 198932
9 198730
10 199328
11 195826
12 195521
13 198620
14 197820
15 197920
16 198919
17 197619
18 195719
19 198615
20 198914

About N. R. Schultz

N. R. Schultz is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 41 papers that have together received 935 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (5 papers), Lightning and Electromagnetic Phenomena (4 papers), Vacuum and Plasma Arcs (4 papers), Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (3 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (3 papers), Power Transformer Diagnostics and Insulation (3 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (3 papers) and Health and Well-being Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (44 citations), Health (135 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (184 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (134 citations) and Applied Psychology (47 citations). N. R. Schultz has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include DeWayne Moore, Merrill F. Elias, Michael A. Robbins, David H. P. Streeten, I. B. Johnson, Penelope K. Elias, William J. Hoyer, Thomas W. Pierce, Karen M. Zabrucky and A. J. Schultz. Their work appears in journals such as Experimental Aging Research, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, Psychology and Aging, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin and Developmental Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact