N. H. Smith

44 papers receiving 3.3k citations

N. H. Smith's Hit Papers

How clonal are bacteria? 1993 · 1.6k citations
1.6k0+11+22Years since publication50010001.5k

Peers

N. H. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
  • Endocrinology 531
  • Microbiology 408
  • Infectious Diseases 686
  • Food Science 699
  • Molecular Medicine 133
Replace Marie‐Adèle Rajandream with:
Marie‐Adèle Rajandream United Kingdom
Jens Peter Christensen Denmark
James M. Schupp United States
Lars Barquist Germany
Jane A. Bygraves United Kingdom
Hervé Bercovier Israel
Joanne E. Russell United Kingdom
Ghislain Fournous France
Duccio Medini Italy
Chengping Lu China
N. H. Smith relative to Marie‐Adèle Rajandream United Kingdom Marie‐Adèle Rajandream's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Marie‐Adèle Rajandream · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by N. H. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of N. H. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by N. H. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites N. H. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by N. H. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by N. H. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by N. H. Smith. The network helps show where N. H. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside N. H. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with N. H. Smith Line = papers co-authored together N. H. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
How clonal are bacteria?
Hit paper breakdown →
19931588
2 1998212
3 1990201
4 1990145
5 1991117
6 199098
7 199597
8 199980
9 199277
10 199377
11 199070
12 200966
13 199060
14 199651
15 195350
16 200846
17 195446
18 201245
19 195241
20 200633

About N. H. Smith

N. H. Smith is a scholar working on Infectious Diseases, Epidemiology, Molecular Biology, Surgery and Food Science, having authored 44 papers that have together received 3.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology (17 papers), Mycobacterium research and diagnosis (17 papers), Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology (8 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (8 papers), Diagnosis and treatment of tuberculosis (6 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (6 papers), Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (6 papers) and Infectious Diseases and Tuberculosis (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology (531 citations), Microbiology (408 citations), Infectious Diseases (686 citations), Food Science (699 citations) and Molecular Medicine (133 citations). N. H. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Spain. Frequent co-authors include John Maynard Smith, Brian G. Spratt, Mark Allen O’Rourke, R K Selander, Pedro J. Beltran, G. B. Mackaness, D. C. Old, Thomas S. Whittam, Kathleen E. Ferris and Dennis J. Kopecko. Their work appears in journals such as Veterinary Record, Journal of Bacteriology, Molecular Biology and Evolution, Infection and Immunity and Journal of Medical Microbiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact