N Din

2.2k citations
23 papers · 885 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

N Din

23 papers receiving 854 citations

Peers

N Din
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Applied Psychology 59
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 191
  • Pharmacology 169
  • Physiology 205
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 30
Replace Ingrid Demmelmaier with:
Ingrid Demmelmaier Sweden
Kelly K. Dineen United States
Noelia Galiano‐Castillo Spain
Sara N. Edmond United States
Carla DeMuro United States
Line Oldervoll Norway
Jacqueline Ashba United States
Jan Gaertner Germany
Carina Boström Sweden
Verna A. Rhodes United States
N Din relative to Ingrid Demmelmaier Sweden Ingrid Demmelmaier's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Ingrid Demmelmaier · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by N Din

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of N Din's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by N Din with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites N Din more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by N Din

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by N Din. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by N Din. The network helps show where N Din may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside N Din, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with N Din Line = papers co-authored together N Din links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013156
2 2012119
3 2013118
4 201591
5 201190
6 201459
7 201342
8 201036
9 201632
10 201329
11 201721
12 201721
13 201419
14 201511
15 201910
16 20187
17 20187
18
The evaluation of the National Exercise Referral Scheme in Wales
20105
19 20144
20 20183

About N Din

N Din is a scholar working on Surgery, Economics and Econometrics, General Health Professions, Pharmacology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 23 papers that have together received 885 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hip and Femur Fractures (7 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (5 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (5 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (5 papers), Physical Activity and Health (4 papers), Chronic Disease Management Strategies (4 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (3 papers) and Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (59 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (191 citations), Pharmacology (169 citations), Physiology (205 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (30 citations). N Din has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Qatar and Pakistan. Frequent co-authors include Nefyn Williams, Clare Wilkinson, Graham Moore, Simon Murphy, Richard D Neal, William Hamilton, Obioha C. Ukoumunne, S Stapley, Laurence Moore and Larry Raisanen. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ Open, Health Technology Assessment, Quality & Quantity, British Journal of Cancer and Health Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact