Mohamed E. E. Shams

30 papers receiving 908 citations

Peers

Mohamed E. E. Shams
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
  • Family Practice 70
  • Pharmacology 161
  • Biological Psychiatry 39
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 169
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 31
Replace Victoria Zarotsky with:
Victoria Zarotsky United States
Caterina Palleria Italy
Deepak Gopal Shewade India
Mahesh N. Samtani United States
K. Br�sen Denmark
Jesús Reviriego Spain
Robert W. Piepho United States
Cheryl L. Laffer United States
Marcella A. Evans United States
Maria Czarina Acelajado United States
Mohamed E. E. Shams relative to Victoria Zarotsky United States Victoria Zarotsky's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.4×
Victoria Zarotsky · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mohamed E. E. Shams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mohamed E. E. Shams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mohamed E. E. Shams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mohamed E. E. Shams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mohamed E. E. Shams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mohamed E. E. Shams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mohamed E. E. Shams. The network helps show where Mohamed E. E. Shams may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mohamed E. E. Shams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mohamed E. E. Shams Line = papers co-authored together Mohamed E. E. Shams links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2019194
2 2006192
3 201499
4 201079
5 201564
6 201151
7 201440
8 201125
9 200424
10 200523
11 200323
12 201319
13 202316
14 200915
15 197214
16
Maspin protein expression: a special feature of papillary thyroid carcinoma.
200612
17 20159
18 20238
19 20158
20 20117

About Mohamed E. E. Shams

Mohamed E. E. Shams is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Oncology, Pharmacology and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 33 papers that have together received 957 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (3 papers), Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (3 papers), Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (2 papers), Heart Failure Treatment and Management (2 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (2 papers), Diet, Metabolism, and Disease (2 papers), Advanced Drug Delivery Systems (2 papers) and Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (70 citations), Pharmacology (161 citations), Biological Psychiatry (39 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (169 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (31 citations). Mohamed E. E. Shams has collaborated with scholars based in Egypt, Germany and Oman. Frequent co-authors include Borros Arneth, Christoph Hiemke, Sebastian Härtter, Michael J. Müller, Rolf Kaiser, Karl J. Lackner, Mohammed M.H. Al-Gayyar, Tanja Falter, Gudrun Hefner and Stefan Unterecker. Their work appears in journals such as Pharmacopsychiatry, Frontiers in Pharmacology, Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal, Psychopharmacology and Life Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact