Mitchell Stein

18 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Mitchell Stein
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
  • Applied Psychology 122
  • Health 120
  • General Health Professions 214
  • Public Administration 32
  • Rheumatology 125
Replace Inga‐Lill Johansson with:
Inga‐Lill Johansson Sweden
Kendon J. Conrad United States
Kristina Areskoug Josefsson Sweden
Lucy Rose Fischer United States
J.A.M. Winnubst Netherlands
Mathilde M. H. Strating Netherlands
Charlotte Delmar Denmark
Timothy D. McBride United States
Barbara McIntosh United States
Jane B. Hopkinson United Kingdom
Mitchell Stein relative to Inga‐Lill Johansson Sweden Inga‐Lill Johansson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.4×
Inga‐Lill Johansson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mitchell Stein

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mitchell Stein's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mitchell Stein with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mitchell Stein more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mitchell Stein

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mitchell Stein. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mitchell Stein. The network helps show where Mitchell Stein may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Mitchell Stein, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mitchell Stein Line = papers co-authored together Mitchell Stein links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 1994424
2 1999143
3
Factor structure of the Arthritis Helplessness Index.
1988111
4 198483
5 198880
6
Comparing the short and long versions of the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales.
198957
7 201850
8 199947
9 201936
10 200831
11 201624
12 20157
13 20166
14 20175
15 20224
16 20222
17 20251
18 20151
19 20150

About Mitchell Stein

Mitchell Stein is a scholar working on Management Information Systems, Accounting, Public Administration, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and General Health Professions, having authored 19 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Accounting and Organizational Management (10 papers), Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (9 papers), Public Policy and Administration Research (4 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (4 papers), Accounting Education and Careers (2 papers), Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies (2 papers), Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (2 papers) and Disaster Response and Management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (122 citations), Health (120 citations), General Health Professions (214 citations), Public Administration (32 citations) and Rheumatology (125 citations). Mitchell Stein has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Kenneth A. Wallston, Craig A. Smith, Perry M. Nicassio, Vaughan S. Radcliffe, Crawford Spence, Philip J. Clements, Ingunn Hansdóttir, Michael H. Weisman, Vanessa L. Malcarne and Robert N. Jamison. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Accounting Research, Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal, Accounting Organizations and Society, Accounting History and Cognitive Therapy and Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact