Mitchell Green

925 citations
33 papers · 476 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Mitchell Green

31 papers receiving 406 citations

Peers

Mitchell Green
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 221
  • Philosophy 199
  • Language and Linguistics 95
  • History and Philosophy of Science 40
  • Human-Computer Interaction 34
Replace Mitchell S. Green with:
Mitchell S. Green United States
Steve Oswald Switzerland
Per Aage Brandt United States
Heather Burnett France
Bede Rundle United Kingdom
Galit W. Sassoon Netherlands
Wolfgang Wildgen Germany
Stefano Predelli United Kingdom
Anne Bezuidenhout United States
Jacques Mœschler Switzerland
Mitchell Green relative to Mitchell S. Green United States Mitchell S. Green's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.5×
Mitchell S. Green · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mitchell Green

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mitchell Green's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mitchell Green with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mitchell Green more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mitchell Green

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mitchell Green. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mitchell Green. The network helps show where Mitchell Green may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Mitchell Green, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mitchell Green Line = papers co-authored together Mitchell Green links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1994120
2 201851
3 201842
4 200731
5 201031
6 201529
7 201626
8 201725
9 202117
10 200715
11 201913
12 202210
13 20218
14
Lionspeak: communication, expression, and meaning
20107
15 20226
16 20166
17 20075
18 20075
19 20234
20 20094

About Mitchell Green

Mitchell Green is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Language and Linguistics, Philosophy, Social Psychology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 33 papers that have together received 476 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (8 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (8 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (8 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (7 papers), Language and cultural evolution (3 papers), Emotions and Moral Behavior (3 papers), Historical Linguistics and Language Studies (2 papers) and Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (221 citations), Philosophy (199 citations), Language and Linguistics (95 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (40 citations) and Human-Computer Interaction (34 citations). Mitchell Green has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Africa and Greece. Frequent co-authors include Nuel Belnap, John N. Williams, Melissa Densmore, Neri Marsili, Dorit Bar‐On, Danny Mann, Ekram Hossain, James N. Kirby, Matti Wilks and Mark Nielsen. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophical Studies, Theoretical Linguistics, Journal of Pragmatics, Philosophia and Minds and Machines.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact