Mitchell Green

914 citations
22 papers · 287 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Mitchell Green

21 papers receiving 258 citations

Peers

Mitchell Green
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Philosophy 128
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 127
  • Human-Computer Interaction 30
  • History and Philosophy of Science 24
  • Language and Linguistics 35
Replace Tamer G. Amin with:
Tamer G. Amin Lebanon
Per Aage Brandt United States
Emar Maier Netherlands
Mitchell S. Green United States
Bede Rundle United Kingdom
Daniel C. Dennett
Maribel Romero Germany
Wolfgang Wildgen Germany
Pieter A. M. Seuren Netherlands
Eli Dresner Israel
Mitchell Green relative to Tamer G. Amin Lebanon Tamer G. Amin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Tamer G. Amin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mitchell Green

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mitchell Green's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mitchell Green with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mitchell Green more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mitchell Green

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mitchell Green. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mitchell Green. The network helps show where Mitchell Green may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Mitchell Green, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mitchell Green Line = papers co-authored together Mitchell Green links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199484
2 201843
3 200729
4 201026
5 201621
6 201521
7 202115
8 20227
9 20217
10 20186
11
Lionspeak: communication, expression, and meaning
20106
12 20225
13 20094
14 20073
15 20233
16 20172
17 20191
18 20231
19 20191
20 20091

About Mitchell Green

Mitchell Green is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Language and Linguistics, Philosophy, Social Psychology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 22 papers that have together received 287 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (7 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (6 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (5 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (3 papers), Emotions and Moral Behavior (2 papers), Historical Linguistics and Language Studies (2 papers), Language and cultural evolution (2 papers) and IoT-based Smart Home Systems (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (128 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (127 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (30 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (24 citations) and Language and Linguistics (35 citations). Mitchell Green has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Africa and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Nuel Belnap, John N. Williams, Melissa Densmore, Neri Marsili, Dorit Bar‐On, Ekram Hossain, Danny Mann, Stephen Barker, Wayne A. Davis and François Récanati. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophical Studies, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, Journal of Pragmatics, Royal Society Open Science and Intercultural Pragmatics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact