Dorit Bar‐On

1.7k citations
42 papers · 562 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Dorit Bar‐On

40 papers receiving 481 citations

Peers

Dorit Bar‐On
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
  • Philosophy 342
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 317
  • Developmental Biology 23
  • History and Philosophy of Science 42
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 168
Replace Hans‐Johann Glock with:
Hans‐Johann Glock Switzerland
Jane Heal United Kingdom
Gregory McCulloch United Kingdom
Julia Tanney United Kingdom
Justin Sytsma New Zealand
Danièle Moyal‐Sharrock United Kingdom
Ljiljana Progovac United States
Charles Travis United Kingdom
Anne Bezuidenhout United States
Jonathan Livengood United States
Dorit Bar‐On relative to Hans‐Johann Glock Switzerland Hans‐Johann Glock's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Hans‐Johann Glock · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dorit Bar‐On

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dorit Bar‐On's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dorit Bar‐On with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dorit Bar‐On more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dorit Bar‐On

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dorit Bar‐On. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dorit Bar‐On. The network helps show where Dorit Bar‐On may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Dorit Bar‐On, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dorit Bar‐On Line = papers co-authored together Dorit Bar‐On links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004133
2 200581
3 201360
4 200055
5 200126
6 200026
7 201321
8 200914
9 202112
10 201510
11 19929
12 19869
13 20209
14 20108
15 19938
16 20137
17 20107
18 19927
19 20177
20
Lionspeak: communication, expression, and meaning
20106

About Dorit Bar‐On

Dorit Bar‐On is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science, Language and Linguistics and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 42 papers that have together received 562 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (16 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (16 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (7 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (5 papers), Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (4 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (4 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (4 papers) and Language and cultural evolution (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (342 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (317 citations), Developmental Biology (23 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (42 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (168 citations). Dorit Bar‐On has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include William G. Lycan, Mark Risjord, Kate Arnold, Richard Moore, Mitchell Green, Crispin Wright and D. Long. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophical Studies, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Noûs, Pacific philosophical quarterly and Erkenntnis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact