Anna Roberts

413 citations
13 papers · 225 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Anna Roberts

11 papers receiving 222 citations

Peers

Anna Roberts
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Applied Psychology 53
  • General Health Professions 97
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 5
  • Demography 35
  • Human-Computer Interaction 14
Replace George Mois with:
George Mois United States
Jay A. Gorman United States
Hilbrand Oldenhuis Netherlands
Tsunetsugu Munakata Japan
Hope Caton United Kingdom
Bart Hattink Netherlands
Laila Øksnebjerg Denmark
Gaston Antezana Australia
Sally Merry New Zealand
Georgina F Bentley United Kingdom
Anna Roberts relative to George Mois United States George Mois's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
George Mois · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Roberts

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Roberts's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Roberts with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Roberts more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Roberts

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Roberts. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Roberts. The network helps show where Anna Roberts may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna Roberts, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Roberts Line = papers co-authored together Anna Roberts links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 202160
2 202149
3 202329
4 202120
5 202119
6 202118
7 202115
8 20219
9
Telemedicine and mHealth Interventions for Children and Young People with Type One Diabetes (T1DM)
20153
10 20241
11 20251
12 20151
13 20250

About Anna Roberts

Anna Roberts is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Demography, having authored 13 papers that have together received 225 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (6 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (5 papers), Technology Use by Older Adults (3 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (2 papers), Workplace Health and Well-being (2 papers), Stress and Burnout Research (2 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (2 papers) and Obesity and Health Practices (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (53 citations), General Health Professions (97 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (5 citations), Demography (35 citations) and Human-Computer Interaction (14 citations). Anna Roberts has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Russia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Tracey A Davenport, Ian B. Hickie, Haley M LaMonica, Alyssa Milton, Ashlea Hambleton, Aliza Werner‐Seidler, Jill M. Newby, Sophie Li, Joanne R. Beames and Samantha Spanos. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Medical Internet Research, JMIR Aging, The Australian Educational Researcher, Educational Psychology Review and Frontiers in Public Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact