Minna Stenius

551 citations
18 papers · 404 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Minna Stenius

15 papers receiving 357 citations

Peers

Minna Stenius
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Applied Psychology 88
  • Communication 84
  • Information Systems and Management 57
  • Marketing 44
  • Business and International Management 3
Replace Dong-Jin Park with:
Dong-Jin Park South Korea
Torgeir Aleti Australia
Marie-Laure Gavard-Perret France
Ying Cheng United States
Stephanie Dellande United States
Jung‐Hua Chang Taiwan
Mitchel R. Murdock United States
Rodica Ianole-Călin Romania
George Brooker
Grace Wen Pan Australia
Minna Stenius relative to Dong-Jin Park South Korea Dong-Jin Park's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.3×
Dong-Jin Park · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Minna Stenius

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Minna Stenius's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Minna Stenius with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Minna Stenius more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Minna Stenius

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Minna Stenius. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Minna Stenius. The network helps show where Minna Stenius may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Minna Stenius, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Minna Stenius Line = papers co-authored together Minna Stenius links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 2020147
2 201664
3 202146
4 202237
5 201633
6 202026
7 201515
8 202215
9 20248
10 20236
11 20232
12 20242
13 20241
14 20241
15 20251
16
Team climate as a predictor of work engagement in knowledge-based organizations
20110
17
What Motivates Experts to Share? A Prospective Test of the Model of Knowledge-Sharing Motivation
20170
18 20240

About Minna Stenius

Minna Stenius is a scholar working on Marketing, Information Systems and Management, Communication, Building and Construction and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, having authored 18 papers that have together received 404 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Consumer Retail Behavior Studies (6 papers), Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (5 papers), Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing (4 papers), Urban and Freight Transport Logistics (4 papers), Knowledge Management and Sharing (4 papers), COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts (2 papers), Consumer Behavior and Marketing Influence (1 paper) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (88 citations), Communication (84 citations), Information Systems and Management (57 citations), Marketing (44 citations) and Business and International Management (3 citations). Minna Stenius has collaborated with scholars based in Finland, Ireland and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Niklas Eriksson, Nelli E. Hankonen, Niklas Ravaja, Ari Haukkala, Wendy Hardeman, Matti T. J. Heino, Marguerite M. Beattie, Martin S. Hagger, Marta Martí Marqués and Keegan Phillip Knittle. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Knowledge Management, British Food Journal, International Journal of Consumer Studies, Nature Human Behaviour and Human Resource Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact