Mingxing Wang

87 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Peers

Mingxing Wang
Comparison fields: 5 of 137
  • Pharmacology 256
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 81
  • Pharmacology 377
  • Nephrology 154
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 103
Replace Shih‐Min Hsia with:
Shih‐Min Hsia Taiwan
Min Ho Han South Korea
Chun‐Hay Ko Hong Kong
Tusty‐Jiuan Hsieh Taiwan
Krishnendu Sinha India
Lusânia Maria Greggi Antunes Brazil
Su Hyun Hong South Korea
Pabitra Bikash Pal India
Yan‐Ling Wu China
Xiang-Chun Shen China
Mingxing Wang relative to Shih‐Min Hsia Taiwan Shih‐Min Hsia's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Shih‐Min Hsia · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mingxing Wang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mingxing Wang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mingxing Wang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mingxing Wang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mingxing Wang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mingxing Wang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mingxing Wang. The network helps show where Mingxing Wang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mingxing Wang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mingxing Wang Line = papers co-authored together Mingxing Wang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 92 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015217
2 2013172
3 2014132
4 2019127
5 201692
6 201888
7 201387
8 201470
9 201569
10 201664
11 202062
12 202261
13 201760
14 201954
15 201153
16 201851
17 201946
18 201945
19 201640
20 201839

About Mingxing Wang

Mingxing Wang is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Pharmacology, Oncology, Pollution and Immunology, having authored 92 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fungal Biology and Applications (11 papers), Polysaccharides and Plant Cell Walls (10 papers), Pharmacological Effects of Natural Compounds (9 papers), Psoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis (5 papers), Membrane Separation Technologies (4 papers), Photochromic and Fluorescence Chemistry (3 papers), Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics (3 papers) and Sirtuins and Resveratrol in Medicine (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (256 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (81 citations), Pharmacology (377 citations), Nephrology (154 citations) and Complementary and alternative medicine (103 citations). Mingxing Wang has collaborated with scholars based in China, Thailand and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Ling‐Dong Kong, Qipin Gao, Duoduo Xu, Yang Gao, Daqing Zhao, Yanqiu Zhang, Wei Zheng, Ying Pan, Dongmei Zhang and Ying Xue Yang. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, Food & Function, International Immunopharmacology, Assay and Drug Development Technologies and International Journal of Oncology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact