Feng‐Nien Ko

102 papers receiving 3.9k citations

Peers

Feng‐Nien Ko
Comparison fields: 5 of 128
  • Pharmacology 633
  • Toxicology 208
  • Biochemistry 431
  • Biochemistry 319
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 407
Replace Akio Iwashima with:
Akio Iwashima Japan
Chun‐Tao Che Hong Kong
Feng Feng China
Xin‐Sheng Yao China
Chieh‐Fu Chen Taiwan
Gil‐Saeng Jeong South Korea
Atif B. Awad United States
Salvador Máñez Spain
Shing‐Chuan Shen Taiwan
Soon Sung Lim South Korea
Feng‐Nien Ko relative to Akio Iwashima Japan Akio Iwashima's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Akio Iwashima · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Feng‐Nien Ko

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Feng‐Nien Ko's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Feng‐Nien Ko with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Feng‐Nien Ko more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Feng‐Nien Ko

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Feng‐Nien Ko. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Feng‐Nien Ko. The network helps show where Feng‐Nien Ko may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Feng‐Nien Ko, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Feng‐Nien Ko Line = papers co-authored together Feng‐Nien Ko links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 102 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1991199
2 1995169
3 1988143
4 1996119
5 1997107
6 1990101
7 1991101
8 1998101
9 199298
10 199592
11 198990
12 199578
13 199778
14 199678
15 199876
16 199476
17 199671
18 199267
19 199165
20 199765

About Feng‐Nien Ko

Feng‐Nien Ko is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Plant Science, Molecular Biology, Biochemistry and Organic Chemistry, having authored 102 papers that have together received 4.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae (20 papers), Plant chemical constituents analysis (10 papers), Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases (10 papers), Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (8 papers), Synthesis of Organic Compounds (8 papers), Traditional Chinese Medicine Analysis (7 papers), Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (7 papers) and Hormonal and reproductive studies (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (633 citations), Toxicology (208 citations), Biochemistry (431 citations), Biochemistry (319 citations) and Complementary and alternative medicine (407 citations). Feng‐Nien Ko has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, Japan and United States. Frequent co-authors include Che‐Ming Teng, Tur‐Fu Huang, Tian-Shung Wu, Chun‐Nan Lin, Yang‐Chang Wu, Jih‐Hwa Guh, Sheng‐Chu Kuo, Chin‐Chung Wu, Sheu‐Meei Yu and Chien-Chih Chen. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Pharmacology, Journal of Natural Products, Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, British Journal of Pharmacology and Planta Medica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact