Mina Roces
Impact in
- Demography top 5%
- Diaspora, migration, transnational identity
- Anthropology top 5%
- Philippine History and Culture
Papers in
-
- Migration and Labor Dynamics 7
- Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy 5
- Historical Gender and Feminism Studies 3
- Anthropology 17
- Philippine History and Culture 17
- Co-authors
- Nicola Piper (2 shared papers)Eléonore Kofman (1 shared paper)Louise Edwards (4 shared papers)
- Journals
- Gender & History (2 papers)Pacific Historical Review (2 papers)Fashion Theory (2 papers)Women s History Review (2 papers)Modern Asian Studies (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesBrazil
In The Last Decade
Mina Roces
26 papers receiving 345 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
- Demography 147
- Anthropology 109
- Sociology and Political Science 397
- Gender Studies 72
- Cultural Studies 48
Countries citing papers authored by Mina Roces
This map shows the geographic impact of Mina Roces's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mina Roces with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mina Roces more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mina Roces
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mina Roces. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mina Roces. The network helps show where Mina Roces may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 3 scholars most cited alongside Mina Roces, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wife or worker? : Asian women and migration | 2003 | 233 |
| 2 | 1994 | 113 | |
| 3 | Introduction: Marriage and Migration in an Age of Globalization | 2003 | 24 |
| 4 | 2009 | 23 | |
| 5 | 2000 | 14 | |
| 6 | 2010 | 12 | |
| 7 | 2005 | 10 | |
| 8 | 1994 | 8 | |
| 9 | 2012 | 8 | |
| 10 | 2010 | 7 | |
| 11 | 2016 | 6 | |
| 12 | 2020 | 5 | |
| 13 | 2013 | 4 | |
| 14 | 2007 | 3 | |
| 15 | 2002 | 3 | |
| 16 | 2014 | 3 | |
| 17 | 2010 | 3 | |
| 18 | 2004 | 2 | |
| 19 | 2010 | 2 | |
| 20 | 2012 | 2 |
About Mina Roces
Mina Roces is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Anthropology, Museology, Demography and Gender Studies, having authored 39 papers that have together received 497 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philippine History and Culture (17 papers), Migration and Labor Dynamics (7 papers), Diaspora, migration, transnational identity (6 papers), Fashion and Cultural Textiles (6 papers), Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy (5 papers), Asian Culture and Media Studies (3 papers), Historical Gender and Feminism Studies (3 papers) and Gender Politics and Representation (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Demography (147 citations), Anthropology (109 citations), Sociology and Political Science (397 citations), Gender Studies (72 citations) and Cultural Studies (48 citations). Mina Roces has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Nicola Piper, Eléonore Kofman and Louise Edwards. Their work appears in journals such as Gender & History, Pacific Historical Review, Fashion Theory, Women s History Review and Modern Asian Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.