Mina Roces
Impact in
- Anthropology top 5%
- Philippine History and Culture
- Demography top 5%
- Diaspora, migration, transnational identity
Papers in
- Anthropology 16
- Philippine History and Culture 16
-
- Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy 4
- Migration and Labor Dynamics 4
- Historical Gender and Feminism Studies 2
- Vietnamese History and Culture Studies 1
- Co-authors
- Nicola Piper (1 shared paper)Eléonore Kofman (1 shared paper)Louise Edwards (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Pacific Historical Review (2 papers)Gender & History (2 papers)Fashion Theory (2 papers)Modern Asian Studies (2 papers)Women s History Review (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaBrazilUnited States
In The Last Decade
Mina Roces
18 papers receiving 302 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
- Anthropology 97
- Demography 120
- Sociology and Political Science 323
- Gender Studies 55
- Cultural Studies 32
Countries citing papers authored by Mina Roces
This map shows the geographic impact of Mina Roces's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mina Roces with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mina Roces more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mina Roces
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mina Roces. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mina Roces. The network helps show where Mina Roces may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 3 scholars most cited alongside Mina Roces, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wife or worker? : Asian women and migration | 2003 | 205 |
| 2 | 1994 | 102 | |
| 3 | 2009 | 19 | |
| 4 | 2000 | 14 | |
| 5 | 1999 | 9 | |
| 6 | 2005 | 9 | |
| 7 | 1994 | 7 | |
| 8 | 2012 | 6 | |
| 9 | 2010 | 6 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 5 | |
| 11 | 2014 | 3 | |
| 12 | 2007 | 3 | |
| 13 | 2002 | 3 | |
| 14 | 2020 | 3 | |
| 15 | 2010 | 3 | |
| 16 | 2004 | 2 | |
| 17 | 2013 | 2 | |
| 18 | 2017 | 1 | |
| 19 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2022 | 1 |
About Mina Roces
Mina Roces is a scholar working on Anthropology, Sociology and Political Science, Museology, Demography and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 25 papers that have together received 405 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philippine History and Culture (16 papers), Fashion and Cultural Textiles (5 papers), Diaspora, migration, transnational identity (4 papers), Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy (4 papers), Migration and Labor Dynamics (4 papers), Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies (2 papers), Historical Gender and Feminism Studies (2 papers) and Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (97 citations), Demography (120 citations), Sociology and Political Science (323 citations), Gender Studies (55 citations) and Cultural Studies (32 citations). Mina Roces has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Brazil and United States. Frequent co-authors include Nicola Piper, Eléonore Kofman and Louise Edwards. Their work appears in journals such as Pacific Historical Review, Gender & History, Fashion Theory, Modern Asian Studies and Women s History Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.