Pacific Historical Review

1.6k papers and 4.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.6k papers published in Pacific Historical Review in the last decades have received a total of 4.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Pacific Historical Review usually cover Sociology and Political Science (468 papers), Cultural Studies (344 papers) and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (273 papers) specifically the topics of American Environmental and Regional History (267 papers), American History and Culture (225 papers) and Asian American and Pacific Histories (204 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Pacific Historical Review are Nancy Oestreich Lurie, Richard White, Erika Lee, Ivan Light, Roger Daniels, Leonard J. Arrington, Kerwin Lee Klein, William Appleman Williams, Roderick Nash and Gary R. Hess.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Pacific Historical Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Pacific Historical Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Pacific Historical Review.

Countries where authors publish in Pacific Historical Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Pacific Historical Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Pacific Historical Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pacific Historical Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025