Nicola Piper

4.4k citations
97 papers · 2.3k · h-index 30

Impact in

Papers in

Nicola Piper

96 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

Nicola Piper
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Public Administration 215
  • Demography 594
  • Sociology and Political Science 2.0k
  • Development 88
  • Political Science and International Relations 459
Replace Cathy McIlwaine with:
Cathy McIlwaine United Kingdom
Luin Goldring Canada
Harald Bauder Canada
Rachel Silvey United States
Martin Ruhs Italy
Michael Jones‐Correa United States
Nicola Yeates United Kingdom
Christina Boswell United Kingdom
Richa Nagar Czechia
Dorothy J. Solinger United States
Nicola Piper relative to Cathy McIlwaine United Kingdom Cathy McIlwaine's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Cathy McIlwaine · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nicola Piper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nicola Piper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicola Piper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicola Piper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nicola Piper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicola Piper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicola Piper. The network helps show where Nicola Piper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nicola Piper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nicola Piper Line = papers co-authored together Nicola Piper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 97 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Wife or worker? : Asian women and migration
2003205
2 200882
3 200681
4 200977
5 200369
6 199767
7 200262
8 200461
9 201757
10 200754
11 200553
12
New perspectives on gender and migration : livelihood, rights and entitlements
200851
13 200350
14
Feminized Migration in East and Southeast Asia: Policies, Actions and Empowerment
200549
15 200946
16 200446
17 201844
18 201740
19 200639
20 201638

About Nicola Piper

Nicola Piper is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Public Administration, General Health Professions and Demography, having authored 97 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Migration and Labor Dynamics (56 papers), Migration, Refugees, and Integration (25 papers), Labor Movements and Unions (22 papers), Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy (19 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (18 papers), International Labor and Employment Law (15 papers), Diaspora, migration, transnational identity (13 papers) and Sex work and related issues (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (215 citations), Demography (594 citations), Sociology and Political Science (2.0k citations), Development (88 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (459 citations). Nicola Piper has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Mina Roces, Eléonore Kofman, Jean Grugel, Matt Withers, Stefan Rother, Keiko Yamanaka, Katja Hujo, Stuart Rosewarne, Sasha Courville and Maruja M.B. Asis. Their work appears in journals such as International Migration, Asian and Pacific migration journal, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, European Journal of East Asian Studies and Critical Asian Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact