Women s History Review

1.7k papers and 5.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.7k papers published in Women s History Review in the last decades have received a total of 5.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Women s History Review usually cover Sociology and Political Science (901 papers), History (697 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (298 papers) specifically the topics of Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (460 papers), Historical Gender and Feminism Studies (454 papers) and Historical Economic and Social Studies (151 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Women s History Review are Gen Doy, Joan Sangster, June Purvis, Penny Tinkler, Liz Frost, Mary O’Dowd, Mary Maynard, Francisca de Haan, Judith Squires and Barbara Bush.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Women s History Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Women s History Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Women s History Review.

Countries where authors publish in Women s History Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Women s History Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Women s History Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Women s History Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025