Min Chiam

2.0k citations
37 papers · 812 · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Min Chiam

36 papers receiving 805 citations

Peers

Min Chiam
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Family Practice 26
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 350
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 99
  • General Health Professions 170
  • Applied Psychology 17
Replace Yun Ting Ong with:
Yun Ting Ong Singapore
Annelissa Chin Singapore
Peter Gallagher New Zealand
Jean Munn United States
Michael Kearney United States
Céline Bourquin Switzerland
Julika Zwack Germany
Mark R. Speicher United States
Deborah L. Seltzer United States
Anne C. Gill United States
Min Chiam relative to Yun Ting Ong Singapore Yun Ting Ong's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Yun Ting Ong · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Min Chiam

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Min Chiam's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Min Chiam with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Min Chiam more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Min Chiam

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Min Chiam. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Min Chiam. The network helps show where Min Chiam may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Min Chiam, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Min Chiam Line = papers co-authored together Min Chiam links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202163
2 202352
3 202048
4 202046
5 202040
6 202038
7 202135
8 202134
9 202031
10 202231
11 202030
12 202125
13 202125
14 202124
15 202223
16 202220
17 202219
18 202119
19 202417
20 202117

About Min Chiam

Min Chiam is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Social Psychology, General Health Professions, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 37 papers that have together received 812 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (8 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (6 papers), Mentoring and Academic Development (4 papers), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (4 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (2 papers), Ethics in medical practice (2 papers), Patient Dignity and Privacy (2 papers) and Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (26 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (350 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (99 citations), General Health Professions (170 citations) and Applied Psychology (17 citations). Min Chiam has collaborated with scholars based in Singapore, United Kingdom and France. Frequent co-authors include Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna, Yun Ting Ong, Stephen Mason, Annelissa Chin, Lorraine Hui En Tan, Kuang Teck Tay, Alexia Sze Inn Lee, Crystal Lim, Limin Wijaya and Xiu Hui Tan. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Palliative Care, BMC Medical Education, Philosophy Ethics and Humanities in Medicine, Asian Bioethics Review and Journal of Pain and Symptom Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact