Miles Williams

4.0k citations
11 papers · 257 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Miles Williams

9 papers receiving 232 citations

Peers

Miles Williams
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 102
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 48
  • Information Systems and Management 23
  • Internal Medicine 10
  • Management Information Systems 29
Replace Steve Goldberg with:
Steve Goldberg United States
Taibo Chen China
Nelson Pinho Portugal
Vipul Gupta India
S Gallagher United Kingdom
Rashed Hossain Bangladesh
Jayakanth Srinivasan United States
Pedro Silva Portugal
Amy Kates United States
Malin Johansson Sweden
Miles Williams relative to Steve Goldberg United States Steve Goldberg's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
Steve Goldberg · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Miles Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Miles Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Miles Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Miles Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Miles Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Miles Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Miles Williams. The network helps show where Miles Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Miles Williams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Miles Williams Line = papers co-authored together Miles Williams links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1
The Essential Guide to Knowledge Management: E-Business and Crm Applications
2000113
2 199678
3 200828
4 199920
5 19928
6 20247
7 20251
8 20191
9
Evolution of definitions and understanding of vascular complications related to transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
20131
10 19960
11 20240

About Miles Williams

Miles Williams is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery, Internal Medicine, Epidemiology and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 11 papers that have together received 257 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Acute Myocardial Infarction Research (2 papers), Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (2 papers), Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (1 paper), Liver Disease and Transplantation (1 paper), Genetic and Kidney Cyst Diseases (1 paper), Advanced Text Analysis Techniques (1 paper), Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management (1 paper) and Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (102 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (48 citations), Information Systems and Management (23 citations), Internal Medicine (10 citations) and Management Information Systems (29 citations). Miles Williams has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, United Kingdom and Bulgaria. Frequent co-authors include Amrit Tiwana, H. D. White, Christopher J. Ellis, B F Williams, J. French, Susan Wyatt, H. Hart, Mark Richards, Gillian Whalley and Νικόλαος Αλέτρας. Their work appears in journals such as American Heart Journal, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England, Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics and BMJ Case Reports.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact