Amy Kates

402 citations
9 papers · 250 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Amy Kates

8 papers receiving 206 citations

Peers

Amy Kates
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Strategy and Management 65
  • Management Information Systems 38
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 38
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 23
  • Nuclear Energy and Engineering 1
Replace Shuling Li with:
Shuling Li China
Hilco J. van Elten Netherlands
Marco Benvenuto Italy
Neelam Kaushal India
Andrew Edwards Australia
Wen-Yen Hsu Taiwan
John G. McClellan United States
Adeel Akhtar United Kingdom
Matthias Fink Austria
Helena Biancuzzi Italy
Amy Kates relative to Shuling Li China Shuling Li's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.2×
Shuling Li · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amy Kates

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amy Kates's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amy Kates with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amy Kates more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amy Kates

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amy Kates. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amy Kates. The network helps show where Amy Kates may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Amy Kates, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amy Kates Line = papers co-authored together Amy Kates links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 201193
2
Designing Your Organization: Using the STAR Model to Solve 5 Critical Design Challenges
200790
3
Designing Dynamic Organizations: A Hands-on Guide for Leaders at All Levels
200140
4 200213
5
The Challenges of General Manager Transitions
20056
6 20153
7
Bridging Organization Design and Performance: Five Ways to Activate a Global Operation Model
20153
8 20242
9 20150

About Amy Kates

Amy Kates is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, Surgery, Political Science and International Relations, Management Information Systems and Applied Psychology, having authored 9 papers that have together received 250 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bone health and osteoporosis research (1 paper), Coaching Methods and Impact (1 paper), Innovation and Knowledge Management (1 paper), Leadership, Human Resources, Global Affairs (1 paper), Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries (1 paper), Organizational Learning and Leadership (1 paper), Quality and Supply Management (1 paper) and Leadership and Management in Organizations (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Strategy and Management (65 citations), Management Information Systems (38 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (38 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (23 citations) and Nuclear Energy and Engineering (1 citation). Amy Kates has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Jay R. Galbraith, Frederick E. Sieber, Benedict F. DiGiovanni, Stephen L. Kates, Daniel Ari Mendelson, Simon C. Mears, Wakenda K. Tyler, Susan V. Bukata, Harry A. Hoyen and Susan M. Friedman. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Organization Design, Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation, Medical Entomology and Zoology and CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact