Mieke Boon

64 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Mieke Boon
Comparison fields: 5 of 156
  • History and Philosophy of Science 210
  • Water Science and Technology 393
  • Health Informatics 37
  • Information Systems and Management 188
  • Environmental Chemistry 196
Replace Ying‐Chih Chen with:
Ying‐Chih Chen Taiwan
Phillip Johnson United States
John W. Renner United States
Jian Qin United States
Zeyuan Liu China
Stephen Carley United States
R.G. Klaassen Netherlands
Tao He China
National Research Council
Mieke Boon relative to Ying‐Chih Chen Taiwan Ying‐Chih Chen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×21.8×
Ying‐Chih Chen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mieke Boon

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mieke Boon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mieke Boon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mieke Boon more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mieke Boon

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mieke Boon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mieke Boon. The network helps show where Mieke Boon may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mieke Boon, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mieke Boon Line = papers co-authored together Mieke Boon links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 66 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020215
2 201885
3 199876
4 201173
5 201162
6 199858
7 199958
8 199851
9 200951
10 202144
11 200642
12 199837
13 201436
14
Theoretical and experimental methods in the modelling of bio-oxidation kinetics of sulphide minerals
199635
15 200133
16 199931
17 202230
18
Models as Epistemic Tools in Engineering Sciences: A Pragmatic Approach.
200930
19 199829
20 199927

About Mieke Boon

Mieke Boon is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Biomedical Engineering, Information Systems and Management, Water Science and Technology and Molecular Biology, having authored 66 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and History of Science (19 papers), Metal Extraction and Bioleaching (11 papers), Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration (10 papers), Minerals Flotation and Separation Techniques (10 papers), Complex Systems and Decision Making (7 papers), Biomedical and Engineering Education (6 papers), Cognitive Science and Education Research (6 papers) and Science and Climate Studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (210 citations), Water Science and Technology (393 citations), Health Informatics (37 citations), Information Systems and Management (188 citations) and Environmental Chemistry (196 citations). Mieke Boon has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, South Africa and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Joseph J. Heijnen, Sophie van Baalen, Tarja Knuuttila, G.S. Hansford, Antoine van den Beemt, Miles MacLeod, Anne L. van de Ven, R.G. Klaassen, Jan van der Veen and Cor Ras. Their work appears in journals such as Hydrometallurgy, European Journal for Philosophy of Science, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice and European Journal of Engineering Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact