Michael Thacker
Impact in
- Physiology top 5%
- Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
- Pharmacology top 2%
- Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Papers in
- Physiology 11
- Pain Mechanisms and Treatments 9
-
- Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation 6
- Co-authors
- Anna K. Clark (2 shared papers)Stephen B. McMahon (2 shared papers)Fabien Marchand (2 shared papers)G. Lorimer Moseley (6 shared papers)Hannu Luomajoki (1 shared paper)Neil E O’Connell (1 shared paper)Luke Parkitny (1 shared paper)James H. McAuley (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- PLoS ONE (3 papers)Gait & Posture (2 papers)Pain (2 papers)The Medical Journal of Australia (1 paper)Movement Disorders (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Michael Thacker
38 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
- Physiology 571
- Pharmacology 364
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 86
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 225
- Neurology 93
Countries citing papers authored by Michael Thacker
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Thacker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Thacker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Thacker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Thacker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Thacker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Thacker. The network helps show where Michael Thacker may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Thacker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2007 | 314 | |
| 2 | 2008 | 273 | |
| 3 | 2010 | 262 | |
| 4 | 2012 | 64 | |
| 5 | 2016 | 58 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 57 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 41 | |
| 8 | 1999 | 38 | |
| 9 | 2015 | 37 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 34 | |
| 11 | 2017 | 24 | |
| 12 | 2012 | 23 | |
| 13 | 2014 | 21 | |
| 14 | 2015 | 18 | |
| 15 | 2016 | 17 | |
| 16 | 2005 | 14 | |
| 17 | 2013 | 13 | |
| 18 | 2015 | 12 | |
| 19 | 2013 | 10 | |
| 20 | 2006 | 10 |
About Michael Thacker
Michael Thacker is a scholar working on Physiology, Pharmacology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 39 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (9 papers), Pain Management and Placebo Effect (7 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (6 papers), Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention (5 papers), Icing and De-icing Technologies (2 papers), Nerve injury and regeneration (2 papers), Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics (2 papers) and Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Physiology (571 citations), Pharmacology (364 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (86 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (225 citations) and Neurology (93 citations). Michael Thacker has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Anna K. Clark, Stephen B. McMahon, Fabien Marchand, G. Lorimer Moseley, Hannu Luomajoki, Neil E O’Connell, Luke Parkitny, James H. McAuley, Benedict M. Wand and Steve Thompson. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Gait & Posture, Pain, The Medical Journal of Australia and Movement Disorders.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.