Thomas Bishop
Impact in
- Developmental Neuroscience top 10%
- Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
- Physiology top 10%
- Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
Papers in
-
- Nerve injury and regeneration 3
- Axon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling 2
-
- Exercise and Physiological Responses 2
- Co-authors
- Stephen Brendan McMahon (7 shared papers)Fabien Marchand (2 shared papers)Ping Kei Yip (2 shared papers)Antony Richard Young (3 shared papers)Steve Thompson (1 shared paper)Anna K. Clark (1 shared paper)John Grist (1 shared paper)Michael A. Thacker (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Anatomy (2 papers)Pain (2 papers)European Journal of Pain (2 papers)iScience (1 paper)Journal of Experimental Biology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomIrelandUnited States
In The Last Decade
Thomas Bishop
12 papers receiving 681 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
- Developmental Neuroscience 56
- Physiology 341
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 252
- Sensory Systems 38
- Behavioral Neuroscience 23
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Bishop
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Bishop's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Bishop with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Bishop more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Bishop
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Bishop. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Bishop. The network helps show where Thomas Bishop may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Bishop, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2008 | 285 | |
| 2 | 2002 | 94 | |
| 3 | 2008 | 82 | |
| 4 | 2007 | 78 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 59 | |
| 6 | 2010 | 57 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 20 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 8 | |
| 9 | The dorsal root transitional zone model of CNS axon regeneration: morphological findings | 2002 | 5 |
| 10 | 2022 | 5 | |
| 11 | 24: The dorsal root transitional zone model of CNS axon regeneration: morphometric findings | 2002 | 3 |
| 12 | 2023 | 1 |
About Thomas Bishop
Thomas Bishop is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Physiology, Genetics and Behavioral Neuroscience, having authored 12 papers that have together received 697 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (3 papers), Animal Genetics and Reproduction (3 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (3 papers), Nerve injury and regeneration (3 papers), Axon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling (2 papers), Exercise and Physiological Responses (2 papers), Pharmacological Effects of Natural Compounds (1 paper) and Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (56 citations), Physiology (341 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (252 citations), Sensory Systems (38 citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (23 citations). Thomas Bishop has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Ireland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Stephen Brendan McMahon, Fabien Marchand, Ping Kei Yip, Antony Richard Young, Steve Thompson, Anna K. Clark, John Grist, Michael A. Thacker, Lawrence David Falcon Moon and Alison Louise Van Eenennaam. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Anatomy, Pain, European Journal of Pain, iScience and Journal of Experimental Biology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.