Mark J. Catley
Impact in
-
- Pain Management and Treatment
- Pharmacology top 1%
- Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Papers in
- Pharmacology 18
- Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation 18
-
- Pain Management and Placebo Effect 6
- Co-authors
- G. Lorimer Moseley (22 shared papers)Neil E O’Connell (9 shared papers)Benedict M. Wand (13 shared papers)Grant R. Tomkinson (1 shared paper)Abby Tabor (5 shared papers)Tasha R. Stanton (6 shared papers)William Gibson (3 shared papers)Catherine Meads (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Pain (6 papers)British Journal of Sports Medicine (3 papers)Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (3 papers)Pain (2 papers)PLoS ONE (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Mark J. Catley
36 papers receiving 1.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 271
- Pharmacology 625
- Cognitive Neuroscience 237
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 93
- Physiology 258
Countries citing papers authored by Mark J. Catley
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark J. Catley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark J. Catley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark J. Catley more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark J. Catley
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark J. Catley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark J. Catley. The network helps show where Mark J. Catley may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark J. Catley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2012 | 242 | |
| 2 | 2011 | 187 | |
| 3 | 2014 | 164 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 164 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 144 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 118 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 91 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 58 | |
| 9 | 2013 | 55 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 49 | |
| 11 | 2015 | 47 | |
| 12 | 2018 | 43 | |
| 13 | 2017 | 42 | |
| 14 | 2017 | 35 | |
| 15 | 2014 | 33 | |
| 16 | 2016 | 31 | |
| 17 | 2016 | 19 | |
| 18 | 2003 | 19 | |
| 19 | 2017 | 19 | |
| 20 | 2023 | 18 |
About Mark J. Catley
Mark J. Catley is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Physiology, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and Rehabilitation, having authored 37 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (18 papers), Pain Management and Placebo Effect (6 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (5 papers), Pain Management and Treatment (3 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (3 papers), Pediatric Pain Management Techniques (1 paper), Urban Green Space and Health (1 paper) and Endometriosis Research and Treatment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (271 citations), Pharmacology (625 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (237 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (93 citations) and Physiology (258 citations). Mark J. Catley has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include G. Lorimer Moseley, Neil E O’Connell, Benedict M. Wand, Grant R. Tomkinson, Abby Tabor, Tasha R. Stanton, William Gibson, Catherine Meads, Hayley B. Leake and Carolyn Berryman. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Pain, British Journal of Sports Medicine, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Pain and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.