Michael Teut

78 papers receiving 989 citations

Peers

Michael Teut
Comparison fields: 5 of 124
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 405
  • Pharmacology 142
  • Health 55
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 14
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 9
Replace Dennis Anheyer with:
Dennis Anheyer Germany
David F. Foster United States
Agnete Egilsdatter Kristoffersen Norway
Tobias Sundberg Sweden
Trine Stub Norway
Gary N Asher United States
Sarah M. Rausch United States
Michael Jeitler Germany
Charles R. Elder United States
Boram Lee South Korea
Michael Teut relative to Dennis Anheyer Germany Dennis Anheyer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10.3×
Dennis Anheyer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Teut

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Teut's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Teut with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Teut more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Teut

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Teut. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Teut. The network helps show where Michael Teut may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Teut, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Teut Line = papers co-authored together Michael Teut links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 89 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017111
2 201274
3 200968
4 201662
5 201461
6 201844
7 201944
8 201340
9 201739
10 202035
11 201426
12 201424
13 202020
14 201319
15 202019
16 201318
17 201516
18 202116
19 202316
20 201014

About Michael Teut

Michael Teut is a scholar working on Complementary and alternative medicine, Health, Pharmacology, General Health Professions and Clinical Psychology, having authored 89 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (55 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (9 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (6 papers), Pain Management and Placebo Effect (5 papers), Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (4 papers), Health, psychology, and well-being (3 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (3 papers) and Biofield Effects and Biophysics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Complementary and alternative medicine (405 citations), Pharmacology (142 citations), Health (55 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (14 citations) and Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (9 citations). Michael Teut has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and India. Frequent co-authors include Claudia M. Witt, med., Benno Brinkhaus, Sylvia Binting, Stephanie Roll, Miriam Ortiz, Barbara Stöckigt, Stefan N. Willich, Daniela Pohl, Hansotto Reiber and Folker A. Hanefeld. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, Homeopathy, Frontiers in Medicine and BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact