Michael Teut

69 papers receiving 773 citations

Peers

Michael Teut
Comparison fields: 5 of 131
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 311
  • Complementary and Manual Therapy 23
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 72
  • Pharmacology 81
  • Clinical Psychology 102
Replace Charles Elder with:
Charles Elder United States
Leyla Özdemir Türkiye
Raheleh Khorsan United States
Tony Y. Chon United States
Stewart Richmond United Kingdom
Clemma Jacobsen United States
Trish Dryden Canada
Susie Wilkinson United Kingdom
Naseem Akhtar Qureshi Saudi Arabia
C. Zollman United Kingdom
Michael Teut relative to Charles Elder United States Charles Elder's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Charles Elder · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Teut

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Teut's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Teut with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Teut more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Teut

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Teut. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Teut. The network helps show where Michael Teut may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Teut, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Teut Line = papers co-authored together Michael Teut links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 82 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201269
2 200961
3 201660
4 201456
5 201843
6 201337
7 201736
8 202033
9 201427
10 201423
11 201319
12 202017
13 202017
14 201317
15 201516
16 202115
17 201915
18 201014
19 202313
20 201812

About Michael Teut

Michael Teut is a scholar working on Complementary and alternative medicine, General Health Professions, Psychiatry and Mental health, Cognitive Neuroscience and Pharmacology, having authored 82 papers that have together received 831 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (39 papers), Health, psychology, and well-being (6 papers), Pain Management and Placebo Effect (6 papers), Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies (5 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (5 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (3 papers), Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research (3 papers) and Ethics in medical practice (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Complementary and alternative medicine (311 citations), Complementary and Manual Therapy (23 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (72 citations), Pharmacology (81 citations) and Clinical Psychology (102 citations). Michael Teut has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Claudia M. Witt, Benno Brinkhaus, Sylvia Binting, Stephanie Roll, Miriam Ortiz, Barbara Stöckigt, Katharina Schnabel, Stefan N. Willich, K. Rostásy and Hansotto Reiber. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, Homeopathy, Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies and Complementary Therapies in Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact