Y Laporte

3.3k citations
109 papers · 2.7k · h-index 27

Impact in

Papers in

Y Laporte

95 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

Y Laporte
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
  • Neurology 582
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 883
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 802
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 206
  • Neurology 350
Replace Carlton C. Hunt with:
Carlton C. Hunt United States
J. F. Iles United Kingdom
I. A. Boyd United Kingdom
L. Jami France
E.D. Schomburg Germany
Kenro Kanda Japan
I. Engberg Sweden
P. R. Burgess United States
R. B. Stein Canada
P Bessou France
Y Laporte relative to Carlton C. Hunt United States Carlton C. Hunt's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Carlton C. Hunt · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Y Laporte

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Y Laporte's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Y Laporte with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Y Laporte more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Y Laporte

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Y Laporte. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Y Laporte. The network helps show where Y Laporte may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Y Laporte, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Y Laporte Line = papers co-authored together Y Laporte links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 109 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1952245
2 1977156
3 1956153
4 1965142
5 1977126
6 1975108
7 199098
8 196696
9 196894
10 198187
11 197181
12 197577
13 195673
14 197372
15 197661
16 197753
17 196852
18 198549
19 196341
20
Effects of stimulating the lumbar sympathetic trunk on cat hindlimb muscle spindles.
198237

About Y Laporte

Y Laporte is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Neurology, Neurology and Physiology, having authored 109 papers that have together received 2.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Muscle activation and electromyography studies (25 papers), Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (18 papers), Neurological disorders and treatments (10 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (9 papers), Nerve injury and regeneration (9 papers), Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment (8 papers), Sports Performance and Training (7 papers) and Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (582 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (883 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (802 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (206 citations) and Neurology (350 citations). Y Laporte has collaborated with scholars based in France, Sweden and United States. Frequent co-authors include F Emonet‐Dénand, P Bessou, L. Jami, David P. C. Lloyd, A. Lundberg, Johann Petit, O. Oscarsson, B Pagès, David J. Barker and David Harker. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Physiology, Journal of Neurophysiology, Brain Research, Trends in Neurosciences and Progress in brain research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact