Michael Schoppmeier
Impact in
- Insect Science top 2%
- Insect and Pesticide Research
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Insect Resistance and Genetics
- Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
- CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Papers in
-
- Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation 10
- Insect Resistance and Genetics 8
- Genetics 12
- Animal Genetics and Reproduction 4
- Spider Taxonomy and Behavior Studies 4
- Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior 3
- Co-authors
- Wim G.M. Damen (12 shared papers)Daniela Großmann (3 shared papers)Gregor Bucher (3 shared papers)Yoshinori Tomoyasu (1 shared paper)Sherry Miller (1 shared paper)Shuichiro Tomita (1 shared paper)Angelika Stollewerk (1 shared paper)Nikola-Michael Prpíc (7 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
Michael Schoppmeier
24 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Insect Science 317
- Molecular Biology 1.1k
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 246
- Genetics 350
- Paleontology 83
Countries citing papers authored by Michael Schoppmeier
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Schoppmeier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Schoppmeier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Schoppmeier more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Schoppmeier
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Schoppmeier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Schoppmeier. The network helps show where Michael Schoppmeier may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Schoppmeier, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2008 | 427 | |
| 2 | 2003 | 180 | |
| 3 | 2014 | 100 | |
| 4 | 2001 | 97 | |
| 5 | 2007 | 64 | |
| 6 | 2005 | 59 | |
| 7 | 2005 | 58 | |
| 8 | 2005 | 36 | |
| 9 | 2013 | 35 | |
| 10 | 2009 | 35 | |
| 11 | 2008 | 35 | |
| 12 | 2010 | 35 | |
| 13 | 2017 | 28 | |
| 14 | 2012 | 26 | |
| 15 | 2008 | 26 | |
| 16 | 2022 | 15 | |
| 17 | 2008 | 14 | |
| 18 | 2012 | 14 | |
| 19 | 2010 | 12 | |
| 20 | 2008 | 11 |
About Michael Schoppmeier
Michael Schoppmeier is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Genetics, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Biomaterials and Insect Science, having authored 24 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation (10 papers), Insect Resistance and Genetics (8 papers), Silk-based biomaterials and applications (6 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (6 papers), Animal Genetics and Reproduction (4 papers), Spider Taxonomy and Behavior Studies (4 papers), Insect Utilization and Effects (3 papers) and Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (317 citations), Molecular Biology (1.1k citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (246 citations), Genetics (350 citations) and Paleontology (83 citations). Michael Schoppmeier has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Spain and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Wim G.M. Damen, Daniela Großmann, Gregor Bucher, Yoshinori Tomoyasu, Sherry Miller, Shuichiro Tomita, Angelika Stollewerk, Nikola-Michael Prpíc, Martin Klingler and Reinhard Schröder. Their work appears in journals such as Cold Spring Harbor Protocols, Developmental Biology, Frontiers in Zoology, Current Biology and Development.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.